pp 1-5 | Cite as

Evaluation of NRTK-Based Heighting Techniques from Different Continuously Operating GNSS Reference Networks in Greece

Chapter
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series

Abstract

GNSS positioning using network-based real-time kinematic (NRTK) techniques, such as the virtual reference station (VRS) and the master auxiliary concept (MAC), is widely used in surveying and geomatics applications. The accuracy of the estimated height component by those techniques is known to be at the centimeter level although several factors, like the deployment of reference stations, the correction message transmission delay, the satellite signal availability and the employed software package, could limit the vertical accuracy obtained in practice. The scope of this paper is to present preliminary results from several field tests that were conducted by the Department of Geodesy and Surveying of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki for the purpose of evaluating the heighting accuracy from different commercial providers of NRTK positioning services in Greece. Our aim is to investigate the actual positional quality of the vertical component from an end-user’s point of view by considering how different factors, such as the number of in-view satellites and their geometry, the duration of station occupancy, the distance to the reference stations and the choice of the applied correction method (VRS or MAC) might affect the final accuracy of the estimated heights. The validation of our results is based on high-quality height information that was independently obtained by precise spirit leveling over all considered test points.

Keywords

GNSS positioning Height estimation NRTK Spirit leveling Vertical accuracy 

References

  1. Bae T-S, Grejner-Brzezinska D, Mader G, Dennis M (2015) Robust analysis of network-based real-time kinematic for GNSS-derived heights. Sensors 15:27215–27229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown N, Geisler I, Troyer L (2006) RTK rover performance using the master-auxiliary concept (MAC). J Glob Position Syst 5(2):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawidowicz K (2013) Analysis of height determination using the ASG-EUPOS NAWGEO service. Tech Sci 16(1):19–39Google Scholar
  4. El-Mowafy A, Fashir H, Al Habbai A, Al Marzooqi Y, Babiker T (2006) Real-time determination of orthometric heights accurate to the centimeter level using a single GPS receiver: case study. J Surv Eng 132(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Featherstone WE, Stewart MP (2001) Combined analysis of real-time kinematic GPS equipment and its users for height determination. J Surv Eng 127(2):31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffmann-Wellenhof B, Lightenegger H, Walse E (2008) GNSS – global navigation satellite systems. Springer, New York, pp 262–266Google Scholar
  7. Janssen VA (2009) A comparison of the VRS and MAC principles for network RTK. In: Proceedings of the international global navigation satellite systems society, surfers paradise, Australia, Dec 1–3, 2009Google Scholar
  8. Katsambalos K, Kotsakis C, Gianniou M (2010) Hellenic terrestrial reference system 2007 (HTRS07): a regional realization of ETRS89 over Greece in support of HEPOS. Bull Geod Geomat LXIX(2–3):329–348Google Scholar
  9. Meng X, Dodson A, Liu C, Moore T, Hill C (2007) Quality assurance of network RTK GNSS positioning: an end-user perspective. In: Proceedings of XXIV IUGG general assembly, Perugia, July 2–13, 2007Google Scholar
  10. Paar R, Novakovic G, Kolovrat D (2014) Vertical component quality comparison of GPS RTK method in combination with laser system vs. conventional methods for height determination. In: Proceedings of INGEO 2014, 6th international conference of engineering surveying, Prague, Apr 3–4, 2014Google Scholar
  11. Paar R, Zrinjski M, Marendic A (2011) Quality check of vertical component using GPS RTK method and laser system. Geodetski vestnik 55(4):689–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Retscher G (2002) Accuracy performance of virtual reference station (VRS) networks. J Glob Position Syst 1(1):12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saghravani SR, Mustapha S, Saghravani SF (2009) Accuracy comparison of RTK-GPS and automatic level for height determination in land surveying. MASAUM J Surv 1(1):10–13Google Scholar
  14. Wang C, Feng Y, Higgins M, Cowie B (2010) Assessment of commercial network RTK user positioning performance over long inter-station distances. J Glob Position Syst 9(1):78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geodesy and SurveyingAristotle University ofThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations