Abstract
It is well known that the inverse gravimetric problem is generally ill-posed and therefore its solution requires some restrictive hypotheses and strong numerical regularization. However, if these initial assumptions are improperly used, the final results could be theoretically and physically admissible but far from the actual mass density distribution. In this work, a Bayesian approach to estimate the mass density distribution from gravity data coupled with a-priori geological information is presented. It requires to model the masses in voxels, each of them characterized by two random variables: one is a discrete label defining the type of material (or the geological unit), the other is a continuous variable defining the mass density (considered constant inside the single voxel). The a-priori geological information is translated in terms of this model, providing for each class of material the mean density and the corresponding variability and for each voxel the a-priori most probable label. Basically the method consists in a simulated annealing aided by a Gibbs sampler with the aim to find the MAP (maximum a posteriori) of the posterior probability distribution of labels and densities given the observations and the a-priori geological model. Some proximity constrains between labels of adjacent voxels are also introduced into the solution.
The proposed Bayesian method is here tested on two simulated scenarios. In particular the first is an example of bathymetry recovering, while the second a salt dome shape estimation. These experiments show the capability of the method to correct the possible inconsistencies between the a-priori geological model and the gravity observations: 86% and 60% of wrong voxels have been corrected in the first and second test respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Azencott R (1988) Simulated annealing. Seminaire Bourbaki 30:223–237
Barbosa VCF, Silva JBC (1994) Generalized compact gravity inversion. Geophysics 59(1):57–68
Barbosa VCF, Silva JBC, Medeiros WE (1997) Gravity inversion of basement relief using approximate equality constraints on depths. Geophysics 62(6):1745–1757
Barbosa VCF, Silva JBC, Medeiros WE (1999) Gravity inversion of a discontinuous relief stabilized by weighted smoothness constraints on depth. Geophysics 64(5):1429–1437
Bayes T (1984) An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 53:370–418
Bosch M (1999) Lithologic tomography: from plural geophysical data to lithology estimation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104(B1):749–766
Bosch M (2004) The optimization approach to lithological tomography: combining seismic data and petrophysics for porosity prediction. Geophysics 69(5):1272–1282
Bosch M, McGaughey J (2001) Joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data under lithologic constraints. Lead Edge 20(8):877–881
Bosch M, Meza R, Jiménez R, Hönig A (2006) Joint gravity and magnetic inversion in 3D using Monte Carlo methods. Geophysics 71(4):G153–G156
Box GEP, Tiao GC (2011) Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Wiley, New York
Caratori Tontini F, Cocchi L, Carmisciano C (2009) Rapid 3-D forward model of potential fields with application to the Palinuro Seamount magnetic anomaly (southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). J Geophys Res Solid Earth 114(B2):1978–2012
Casella G, Robert CP (1999) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, New York
Christensen NI, Mooney WD (1995) Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: a global view. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 100(B6):9761–9788
De Lacy MC, Sansò F, Rodriguez-Caderot G, Gil AJ (2002) The Bayesian approach applied to GPS ambiguity resolution. A mixture model for the discrete-real ambiguities alternative. J Geodesy 76(2):82–94
Fedi M (2006) DEXP: a fast method to determine the depth and the structural index of potential fields sources. Geophysics 72(1):I1–I11
Fedi M, Rapolla A (1999) 3-D inversion of gravity and magnetic data with depth resolution. Geophysics 64(2):452–460
Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI-6:721–741
Gordon AC, Mohriak WU, Barbosa VCF (2012) Crustal architecture of the Almada Basin, NE Brazil: an example of a non-volcanic rift segment of the South Atlantic passive margin. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 369:215–234
Guillen A, Menichetti V (1984) Gravity and magnetic inversion with minimization of a specific functional. Geophysics 49(8):1354–1360
Guillen A, Calcagno P, Courrioux G, Joly A, Ledru P (2008) Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge: part II. Modelling validation using gravity and magnetic data inversion. Phys Earth Planet In 171(1):158–169
Last BJ, Kubik K (1983) Compact gravity inversion. Geophysics 48(6):713–721
Medeiros WE, Silva JBC (1996) Geophysical inversion using approximate equality constraints. Geophysics 61(6):1678–1688
Mosegaard K, Tarantola A (2002) Probabilistic approach to inverse problems. Int Geophys 81:237–265
Nagihara S, Hall SA (2001) Three-dimensional gravity inversion using simulated annealing: constraints on the diapiric roots of allochthonous salt structures. Geophysics 66(5):1438–1449
Nagy D (1966) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism. Geophysics 31(2):362–371
Parker RL (1973) The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Geophys J R Astron Soc 31(4):447–455
Parker RL (1975) The theory of ideal bodies for gravity interpretation. Geophys J Int 42(2):315–334
Roy L, Sen MK, Blankenship DD, Stoffa PL, Richter TG (2005) Inversion and uncertainty estimation of gravity data using simulated annealing: an application over Lake Vostok, East Antarctica. Geophysics 70(1):J1–J12
Rozanov YA (1982) Markov random fields. Springer, New York
Sampietro D, Sansò F (2012) Uniqueness theorems for inverse gravimetric problems. IAG Symp 137:111–115
Sansò F, Reguzzoni M, Triglione D (2011) Metodi Monte Carlo e delle Catene di Markov: una introduzione (in Italian). Maggioli Editore.
Smith AFM, Roberts GO (1993) Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 55(1):3–23
Tarantola A (2002) Inverse problem theory: methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Tarantola A, Valette B (1982) Inverse problems = quest for information. J Geophys 50(3):150–170
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that contributed to improving the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rossi, L., Reguzzoni, M., Sampietro, D., Sansò, F. (2015). Integrating Geological Prior Information into the Inverse Gravimetric Problem: The Bayesian Approach. In: Sneeuw, N., Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sansò, F. (eds) VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 142. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_57
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24548-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30530-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)