IAG 150 Years pp 241-247 | Cite as

Covariance Analysis and Sensitivity Studies for GRACE Assimilation into WGHM

  • Maike SchumacherEmail author
  • Annette Eicker
  • Jürgen Kusche
  • Hannes Müller Schmied
  • Petra Döll
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 143)


An ensemble Kalman filter approach for improving the WaterGAP Global Hydrology Model (WGHM) has been developed, which assimilates Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) data and calibrates the model parameters, simultaneously. The method uses the model-derived states and satellite measurements and their error information to determine updated water storage states. However, due to the fact that hydrological models do not provide any error information, an empirical covariance matrix needs to be calculated. In this paper, therefore, we analyse the combined state and parameter covariance matrix of WGHM. We found that high correlations of up to 0.75 exist between calibration parameters and storage compartments, and that these allow for an efficient calibration. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is performed to identify those parameters that the water compartments are most sensitive to. The performed analysis is important, since GRACE cannot observe the model parameters directly. We found that those parameters, which the water storage is most sensitive to, differ not only regionally, but also with respect to the water compartments. Not unexpected, some climate input multipliers implemented in our model version have an overall strong influence. We also found that the degree of sensitivity changes temporally, e.g. between 0 (in summer) and 0.5 (in winter) for the snow storage.


Assimilation Calibration GRACE Sensitivity WGHM 



The support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the framework of the Special Priority Program “Mass transport and mass distribution in the system Earth” (SPP1257) under the project REGHYDRO is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 207:105–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eicker A, Schumacher M, Kusche J, Döll P, Müller Schmied H (2014) Calibration/Data Assimilation Approach for Integrating GRACE Data into the WaterGAP Global Hydrology Model (WGHM) Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter: First Results. Surve Geophys 35(6):1285–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evensen G (2009) Data assimilation. The Ensemble Kalman Filter. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forootan E, Didova O, Schumacher M, Kusche J, Elsaka B (2014) Comparisons of atmospheric mass variations derived from ECMWF reanalysis and operational fields, over 2003 to 2011. J Geod 88(5):503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Güntner A, Stuck J, Werth S, Döll P, Verzano K, Merz B (2007) A global analysis of temporal and spatial variations in continental water storage. Water Resour Res 43:W05416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamby DM (1994) A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environ Monit Assess 32:135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoffman FO, Gardner RH (1983) Evaluation of uncertainties in environmental radiological assessment models. In: Till JE, Meyer HR (eds) Radiological assessment: a textbook on environmental dose assessment. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC. Report No. NUREG/CR-3332Google Scholar
  8. Iman RL, Conover WJ (1979) The use of the rank transform in regression. Technometrics 21:499–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaspar F (2004) Entwicklung und Unsicherheitsanalyse eines globalen hydrologischen Modells (in German). Dissertation, University of KasselGoogle Scholar
  10. Müller Schmied H, Eisner S, Franz D, Wattenbach M, Portmann FT, Flörke M, Döll P (2014) Sensitivity of simulated global-scale freshwater fluxes and storages to input data, hydrological model structure, human water use and calibration. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:3511–3538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schumacher M (2012) Assimilation of GRACE data into a global hydrological model using an ensemble Kalman filter. Master Thesis, University of BonnGoogle Scholar
  12. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31:L09607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wahr JM, Molenaar M, Bryan F (1998) Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. J Geophys Res 108(B12):30205–30229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Werth S, Güntner A (2009) Calibration analysis for water storage variability of the global hydrological model WGHM. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zaitchik BF, Rodell M, Reichle RH (2008) Assimilation of GRACE terrestrial water storage data into a land surface model: results for the mississippi river basin. J Hydrometeorol 9(3):535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maike Schumacher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Annette Eicker
    • 1
  • Jürgen Kusche
    • 1
  • Hannes Müller Schmied
    • 2
  • Petra Döll
    • 2
  1. 1.Astronomical, Physical and Mathematical Geodesy GroupUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Physical GeographyUniversity of Frankfurt/MainFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations