Skip to main content

Requirements, Test Strategies, and Evaluation of Anti-Contamination and Easy-to-Clean Surfaces, and New Approaches for Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contamination Mitigating Polymeric Coatings for Extreme Environments

Part of the book series: Advances in Polymer Science ((POLYMER,volume 284))

Abstract

The use of novel insect mitigating surfaces on leading edges of aircraft is one method to assist in preserving natural laminar conditions on selected areas such as wings or vertical stabilizers. Development of such surfaces is extremely challenging because of stringent requirements on resistance to aircraft fluids and to environmental conditions such as ultraviolet radiation, rain, and sand erosion.

For assessment of insect-mitigating properties of surfaces, new laboratory methods were developed that are suitable for comparing insect contamination behavior and cleanability of surfaces. When testing surfaces while considering the influence of topography and chemistry using these methods, it was observed that superhydrophobic surfaces with a particular topography are essential to reduce contamination significantly. For these surfaces, the roughest surfaces produced the lowest contamination. This observation confirms results recently published by other authors. However, the current study shows that roughness is a disadvantage for cleanability. Easy cleanability after contamination with flies or insect hemolymph-containing liquid was only observed for smooth, hydrophobic surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yi O et al (1988) A fundamental approach to the sticking of insect residues to aircraft wings. Virginia Tech Center for adhesive and sealant science. CAS/CHEM 188:29–88

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gruenke S (2012) Anti-contamination and easy-to-clean coatings for aerodynamic efficient surfaces. In: Proceedings of 19th international conference on surface treatments in the aeronautics and aerospace industries, Biarritz, France, 31 May–1 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kok M, Young TM (2014) Evaluation of insect residue resistant coatings – correlation of a screening method with a conventional assessment technique. Prog Org Coat 77:1382–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kok M, Young TM (2014) The evaluation of hierarchical structured superhydrophobic coatings for the alleviation of insect residue to aircraft laminar flow surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 314:1053–1062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin JC, Whalen EA et al (2016) Innovative flow control concepts for drag reduction. In: Proceeding of the 54st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, San Diego, USA, 4–8 Jan 2016: AIAA 2016-0864

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patzelt G et al (2016) Anti-icing and anticontamination properties of coatings induced by surface structure. J Coat Technol Res 13(4):589–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mankins JC (1995) Technology readiness levels: a white paper. NASA, Office of Space Access and Technology, Advanced Concepts Office. 6 April 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kok M et al (2013) Influence of surface characteristics on insect residue adhesion to aircraft leading edge surfaces. Prog Org Coat 76:1567–1575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krishnan KG et al (2017) Influence of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces on reducing aerodynamic insect residues. Appl Surf Sci 392:723–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kok M et al (2015) Critical considerations in the mitigation of insect residue contamination on aircraft surfaces – a review. Prog Aerosp Sci 75:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DIN EN ISO 16474-3 (2013) Paints and varnishes – methods of exposure to laboratory light sources, part 3: fluorescent UV lamps, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  12. AMS3095A (2004) Paint: high gloss for airline exterior system. SAE International, Warrendale, PA. 1 Dec 2004

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wermuth L et al (2015) Superhydrophobic surfaces based on self-organized TiO2-nanotubes. Prog Org Coat 87:242–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siochi E et al (2013) Engineered surfaces for mitigation of insect residue adhesion. In: Paper presented at the SAMPE 2013, Long Beach, CA, USA, 6–9 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wohl C et al (2013) Evaluation of commercially available materials to mitigate insect residue adhesion on wing leading edge surfaces. Prog Org Coat 76:42–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shanahan M, Wohl C et al (2015) Flight testing surfaces engineered for mitigating insect residues adhesion on a Falcon HU-25C. In: Abstracts of the 38th meeting of the adhesion society, Savannah, Georgia, USA, 21–25 February 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of the research work leading to the results published in this chapter has been co-funded by the European Commission “Seventh Research Framework Programme” (FP7/2007-2013) for the Clean Sky Joint Technology Initiative under Grant Agreement no CSJU-GAM-SFWA-2008-001. Further development work was funded by BMWi under LUFO V-1 LDAinOp no 20A1103A.

We acknowledge the Fraunhofer Institute in Bremen, IFAM, for performing several tests as a partner in JTI-SFWA and LUFO LDAinOp. Furthermore, we acknowledge DLR Braunschweig for performing the flight test and Airbus Group Innovation for providing TiO2 samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silke Gruenke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gruenke, S. (2017). Requirements, Test Strategies, and Evaluation of Anti-Contamination and Easy-to-Clean Surfaces, and New Approaches for Development. In: Wohl, C., Berry, D. (eds) Contamination Mitigating Polymeric Coatings for Extreme Environments. Advances in Polymer Science, vol 284. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2017_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics