Advertisement

pp 1-21 | Cite as

Icephobicity: Definition and Measurement Regarding Atmospheric Icing

  • Jean-Denis Brassard
  • Caroline Laforte
  • Frederic Guerin
  • Caroline Blackburn
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Polymer Science book series

Abstract

Atmospheric ice that adheres to structures and accumulates is a critical issue in numerous northern areas. Even if different de-icing methods exist, they consume a great deal of energy or necessitate elaborate infrastructures. However, using coatings with icephobic properties could be the “miracle” solution. This chapter proposes a complete definition of icephobicity in line with the ice adhesion test methods used. The general way to assess this property is described using a holistic approach, the first step of which is a screening test campaign with many different candidate coatings evaluated in terms of their adhesion reduction factor (ARF). The relevance of this factor is also discussed. Further tests are recommended, after the better candidate coatings are identified, in an extensive test campaign performed under simulated icing and outdoor conditions prevailing in the real environment of the targeted application. Finally, a specific example of a test campaign in which the icephobic coatings are exposed to Arctic offshore conditions is presented.

Keywords

Atmospheric icing Coating Ice Ice accumulation Ice adhesion Icephobic 

References

  1. 1.
    Aviation Safety (1971) Surgut aeroflot antonov. http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19710122-0. Accessed 30 Sept 2016
  2. 2.
    Aviation Safety (1974) Turkish airlines flight 301. http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19740126-0. Accessed 30 Sept 2016
  3. 3.
    National Transportation Safety Board (1982) Aircraft accident report: Air Florida flight 90. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aviation Safety (1985) Arrow air flight 1285. http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19851212-0. Accessed 30 Sept 2016
  5. 5.
    Moshansky VP (1992) Commission of inquiry into the air Ontario crash at Dryden, Ontario (Canada). http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/301/pco-bcp/commissions-ef/moshansky1992-eng/moshansky1992-eng.htm. Accessed 30 Sept 2016
  6. 6.
    National Transportation Safety Board (1992) Aircraft accident report: USAIR flight 405. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Transportation Safety Board (1994) Aircraft accident report: Americain Eagle flight 4184. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aviation Safety (2004) China eastern airlines flight 5210. http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20041121-0. Accessed 30 Sept 2016
  9. 9.
    National Transportation Safety Board (2009) Aircraft accident report: Colgan Air flight 3407. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aviation Safety (2009) Air France flight 447. https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20090601-0. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  11. 11.
    Transports Canada (2005) Guidelines for aircraft ground icing operations. OttawaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laforte J-L, Allaire M-A, Laflamme J (1998) State-of-the-art on power line de-icing. Atmos Res 46(1):143–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(97)00057-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    SAE AMS1424 (2016) Deicing/anti-icing fluid, aircraft, SAE Type I. SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    SAE AMS1428 (2017) Fluid aircraft deicing/anti-icing, non Newtonian (Pseudoplastic), SAE Types II, Type III and Type IV. SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SAE AMS1431 (2012) Compound, solid runway and taxiway deicing/anti-icing. SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    SAE AMS1435 (2012) Fluid, generic, deicing/anti-icing runways and taxiways. SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goraj Z (2004) An overview of the deicing and antiicing. Paper presented at the 24th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, YokohamaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Landy M, Freiberger A (1967) Studies of ice adhesion: ice adhesion to plastics. J Colloid Interf Sci 25(2):231–244ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tarquini S, Antonini C, Amirfazli A, Marengo M, Palacios J (2014) Investigation of ice shedding properties of superhydrophobic coatings on helicopter blades. Cold Reg Sci Technol 100:50–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laforte C, Blackburn C, Perron J, Aubert R (2014) Icephobic coating evaluation for aerospace application. Paper presented at the 55th AIAA/ASMe/ASCE/AHS/SC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, National HarborGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Susoff M, Siegmann K, Pfaffenroth C, Hirayama M (2013) Evaluation of icephobic coatings—screening of different coatings and influence of roughness. Appl Surf Sci 282:870–879.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.073 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Makkonen L (2012) Ice adhesion – theory, measurements and countermeasures. J Adhes Sci Technol 26(4–5):413–445.  https://doi.org/10.1163/016942411x574583 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kreder MJ, Alvarenga J, Kim P, Aizenberg J (2016) Design of anti-icing surfaces: smooth, textured or slippery? Nat Rev Mater 1:15003ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schutzius TM, Jung S, Maitra T, Eberle P, Antonini C, Stamatopoulos C, Poulikakos D (2014) Physics of icing and rational design of surfaces with extraordinary icephobicity. Langmuir 31(17):4807–4821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sojoudi H, Wang M, Boscher N, McKinley G, Gleason K (2016) Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces. Soft Matter 12(7):1938–1963ADSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    He Y, Jiang C, Cao X, Chen J, Tian W, Yuan W (2014) Reducing ice adhesion by hierarchical micro-nano-pillars. Appl Surf Sci 305:589–595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.139 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiao J, Chaudhuri S (2012) Design of anti-icing coatings using supercooled droplets as nano-to-microscale probes. Langmuir 28(9):4434–4446.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la2034565 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung S, Dorrestijn M, Raps D, Das A, Megaridis CM, Poulikakos D (2011) Are superhydrophobic surfaces best for icephobicity? Langmuir 27(6):3059–3066.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la104762g CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zheng L, Li Z, Bourdo S, Khedir KR, Asar MP, Ryerson CC, Biris AS (2011) Exceptional superhydrophobicity and low velocity impact icephobicity of acetone-functionalized carbon nanotube films. Langmuir 27(16):9936–9943.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la201548k CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parent O, Ilinca A (2011) Anti-icing and de-icing techniques for wind turbines: critical review. Cold Reg Sci Technol 65(1):88–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Antonini C, Innocenti M, Horn T, Marengo M, Amirfazli A (2011) Understanding the effect of superhydrophobic coatings on energy reduction in anti-icing systems. Cold Reg Sci Technol 67(1–2):58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baum B, Thoma LA, Holley WH (1996) Development of conductor deicing systems. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, p 133Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andersson L-O, Golander C-G, Persson S (1994) Ice adhesion to rubber materials. J Adhes Sci Technol 8(2):117–132.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856194X00104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Croutch VK, Hartley RA (1992) Adhesion of ice to coatings and the performance of ice release coatings. J Coating Technol 64(815):41–53Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoshida M, Ohichi T, Konno K, Gocho M (1991) Adhesion of ice to various materials. Paper presented at the cold regions technology conference, JapanGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lliboutry L (1964) Traite de glaciologie. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schulz M, Sinapius M (2015) Evaluation of different ice adhesion tests for mechanical deicing systems. Paper presented at the international conference on icing of aircraft, engines, and structures, PragueGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haehnel RB (2002) Evaluation of coatings for icing control at hydraulic structures. Ice Eng 33:4Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jellinek HG (1959) Adhesive properties of ice. J Coll Sci 14(3):268–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Druez J, Phan LC, Laforte J-L, Nguyen DD (1979) The adhesion of glaze and rime on aluminium electrical conductors. Trans CSME 5(4):215–220Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Blackburn C, Laforte C, Laforte J-L (2000) Apparatus for measuring the adhesion force of a thin ice sheet on a substrate. Paper presented at the 9th international workshop on atmospheric icing on structures, Chester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Javan-Mashmool M, Volat C, Farzaneh M (2006) A new method for measuring ice adhesion strength at an ice-substrate interface. Hydrol Process 20(4):645–655ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Laforte C, Beisswenger A (2005) Icephobic material centrifuge adhesion test. Paper presented at the 11th international workshop on atmospheric icing on structures, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stallabrass JR, Price RD (1963) On the adhesion of ice to various materials, National Research Laboratories. Can Aeronaut Space J 9:199–204Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Raraty LE, Tabor D (1958) The adhesion and strength properties of ice. Proc Soc Math Phys Sci 245(1241):184–201.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fortin G, Beisswenger A, Perron J (2010) Centrifuge adhesion test to evaluate icephobic coatings. Paper presented at the 2nd AIAA atmospheric and space environments conference, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guerin F, Laforte C, Farinas M-I, Perron J (2016) Analytical model based on experimental data of centrifuge ice adhesion tests with different substrates. Cold Reg Sci Technol 121:93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Laforte C, Blackburn C, Perron J (2015) A review of icephobic coating performances over the last decade. Paper presented at the conference on icing of aircraft, engines, and structures, Prague, Czech Republic, June 22–25Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    SAE AIR4096 (1995) Droplet size instrumentation used in icing facilities. SAE International, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bengaluru Subramanyam S, Kondrashov V, Rühe J, Varanasi KK (2016) Low ice adhesion on nano-textured superhydrophobic surfaces under supersaturated conditions. ACS Appl Mater Inter 8(20):12583–12587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bharathidasan T, Kumar V, Bobji M, Chakradhar R, Basu BJ (2014) Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice-adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 314:241–250ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brassard JD, Sarkar DK, Perron J, Audibert-Hayet A, Melot D (2015) Nano-micro structured superhydrophobic zinc coating on steel for prevention of corrosion and ice adhesion. J Colloid Interface Sci 447:240–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.076 ADSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dixon B, Walsh A, Gall B, Goodwin M (2011) Novel phase change material icephobic coating for ice mitigation in marine environments. In: Proceedings of the 12th general assembly of IAMU, GydniaGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dodiuk H, Kenig S, Dotan A (2012) Do self-cleaning surfaces repel ice? J Adhes Sci Technol 26(4–5):701–714Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Foroughi Mobarakeh L, Jafari R, Farzaneh M (2013) The ice repellency of plasma polymerized hexamethyldisiloxane coating. Appl Surf Sci 284:459–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.119 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Smith JG, Wohl CJ, Kreeger RE, Palacios J, Knuth T, Hadley KR (2016) Effect of molecular flexibility upon ice adhesion shear strength. Paper presented at the 39th annual adhesion society meeting, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kulinich SA, Farzaneh M (2009) Ice adhesion on super-hydrophobic surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 255(18):8153–8157ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Li W, Zhang X, Yang J, Miao F (2013) In situ growth of superhydrophobic and icephobic films with micro/nanoscale hierarchical structures on the aluminum substrate. J Coll Inter Sci 410:165–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.07.063 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ling EJY, Uong V, Renault-Crispo J-S, Kietzig A-M, Servio P (2016) Reducing ice adhesion on nonsmooth metallic surfaces: wettability and topography effects. ACS Appl Mater Inter 8(13):8789–8800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Menini R, Farzaneh M (2009) Elaboration of Al2O3/PTFE icephobic coatings for protecting aluminium surfaces. Surf Coat Technol 203:1941–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Momen G, Jafari R, Farzaneh M (2015) Ice repellency behaviour of superhydrophobic surfaces: effects of atmospheric icing conditions and surface roughness. Appl Surf Sci 349:211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Brassard JD (2016) Revêtements nanostructurés pour la protection des métaux dans les environnements marins – Nanostructured coatings for the protection of metal in marine environments. Dissertation, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, ChicoutimiGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    ASTM D1141-98 (2013) Standard practice for the preparation of substitute ocean water. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    ASTM D4587-11 (2011) Standard practice for fluorescent UV-condensation exposures of paint and related coatings. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Denis Brassard
    • 1
  • Caroline Laforte
    • 1
  • Frederic Guerin
    • 1
  • Caroline Blackburn
    • 1
  1. 1.Anti-Icing Materials International LaboratoryUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiChicoutimiCanada

Personalised recommendations