Advertisement

Gradient and Microfluidic Library Approaches to Polymer Interfaces

  • Michael J. Fasolka
  • Christopher M. Stafford
  • Kathryn L. Beers
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Polymer Science book series (POLYMER, volume 225)

Abstract

We present an overview of research conducted at the National Institute of Standards and Technology aimed at developing and applying combinatorial and high-throughput measurement approaches to polymer surfaces, interfaces and thin films. Topics include (1) the generation of continuous gradient techniques for fabricating combinatorial libraries of film thickness, temperature, surface chemistry and polymer blend composition, (2) high-throughput measurement techniques for assessing the mechanical properties and adhesion of surfaces, interfaces and films, and (3) microfluidic approaches to synthesizing and analyzing libraries of interfacially-active polymer species.

Keywords

Block Copolymer Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Polymer Brush Peel Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Webster DC (2005) Radical change in research and development: the shift from conventional methods to high-throughput methods. JCT Coat Technol 2:24–29Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hanak JJ (1970) Multiple-sample-concept in materials research – synthesis, compositional analysis and testing of entire multicomponent systems. J Mater Sci 5:964Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meredith JC, Karim A, Amis EJ (2000) High-throughput measurement of polymer blend phase behavior. Macromolecules 33:5760–5762Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meredith JC, Karim A, Amis EJ (2002) Combinatorial methods for investigations in polymer materials science. MRS Bull 27:330–335Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stafford CM, Roskov KE, Epps TH, Fasolka MJ (2006) Generating thickness gradients of thin polymer films via flow coating. Rev Sci Instrum 77:023908Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang X, Berry BC, Yager KG, Kim S, Jones RL, Satija S, Pickel DL, Douglas JF, Karim A (2008) Surface morphology diagram for cylinder-forming block copolymer thin films. ACS Nano 2:2331–2341Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Gans BJ, Wijnans S, Woutes D, Schubert US (2005) Sector spin coating for fast preparation of polymer libraries. J Comb Chem 7:952–957Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cull TR, Goulding MJ, Bradley M (2007) Liquid crystal libraries-ink-jet formulation and high-throughput analysis. Adv Mater 19:2355–2359Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meier MAR, Schubert US (2005) Integration of MALDI-TOFMS as high-throughput screening tool into the workflow of combinatorial polymer research. Rev Sci Instrum 76:062211Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yoshioka Y, Calvert PD, Jabbour GE (2005) Simple modification of sheet resistivity of conducting polymeric anodes via combinatorial ink-jet printing techniques. Macromol Rapid Commun 26:238–246Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Gans BJ, Kazancioglu E, Meyer W, Schubert US (2004) Ink-jet printing polymers and polymer libraries using micropipettes. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:292–296Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koner L, Kofler W (1949) A heating bed for rapid determination of the melting point. Mikrochem Mikrohim Acta 34:374–381Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sehgal A, Karim A, Stafford CF, Fasolka MJ (2003) Techniques for combinatorial and high-throughput microscopy: part 1: gradient specimen fabrication for polymer thin films research. Micros Today 11:26–29Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beers KL, Douglas JF, Amis EJ, Karim A (2003) Combinatorial measurements of crystallization growth rate and morphology in thin films of isotactic polystyrene. Langmuir 19:3935–3940Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lucas LA, DeLongchamp DM, Vogel BM, Lin EK, Fasolka MJ, Fischer DA, McCulloch I, Heeney M, Jabbour GE (2007) Combinatorial screening of the effect of temperature on the microstructure and mobility of a high performance polythiophene semiconductor. Appl Phys Lett 90:012112Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eidelman N, Raghavan D, Forster AM, Amis EJ, Karim A (2004) Combinatorial approach to characterizing epoxy curing. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:259–263Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roberson SV, Faheya AJ, Sehgal A, Karim A (2002) Multifunctional ToF-SIMS: combinatorial mapping of gradient energy substrates. Appl Surf Sci 200:150–164Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith AP, Sehgal A, Douglas JF, Karim A, Amis EJ (2003) Combinatorial mapping of surface energy effects on diblock copolymer thin film ordering. Macromol Rapid Commun 24:131–135Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berry BC, Stafford CM, Pandya M, Lucas LA, Karim A, Fasolka MJ (2007) Versatile platform for creating gradient combinatorial libraries via modulated light exposure. Rev Sci Instrum 78:072202Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elwing H, Welin S, Askendal A, Nilsson U, LundstrÖm I (1987) A wettability gradient method for studies of macromolecular interactions at the liquid/solid interface. J Colloid Interface Sci 119:203–210Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chaudhury MK, Whitesides GM (1992) How to make water run uphill. Science 256:1539–1541Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Genzer J (2005) Templating surfaces with gradient assemblies. J Adhes 81:417–435Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao H, Beysens D (1995) From droplet growth to film growth on a heterogeneous surface – condensation associated with a wettability gradient. Langmuir 11:627–634Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liedberg B, Tengvall P (1995) Molecular gradients of omega-substituted alkanethiols on gold – preparation and characterization. Langmuir 11:3821–3827Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liedberg B, Wirde M, Tao YT, Tengvall P, Gelius U (1997) Molecular gradients of omega-substituted alkanethiols on gold studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Langmuir 13:5329–5334Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morgenthaler S, Lee S, Zurcher S, Spencer ND (2003) A simple, reproducible approach to the preparation of surface-chemical gradients. Langmuir 19:10459–10462Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morgenthaler SM, Lee S, Spencer ND (2006) Submicrometer structure of surface-chemical gradients prepared by a two-step immersion method. Langmuir 22:2706–2711Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ashley KM, Raghavan D, Douglas JF, Karim A (2005) Wetting-dewetting transition line in thin polymer films. Langmuir 21:9518–9523Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fasolka MJ, Mayes AM (2001) Block copolymer thin films: physics and applications. Annu Rev Mater Res 31:323–355Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith AP, Douglas JF, Meredith JC, Amis EJ, Karim A (2001) Combinatorial study of surface pattern formation in thin block copolymer films. Phys Rev Lett 87:015503Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ludwigs S, Schmidt K, Stafford CM, Amis EJ, Fasolka MJ, Karim A, Magerle R, Krausch G (2005) Combinatorial mapping of the phase behavior of ABC triblock terpolymers in thin films: Experiments. Macromolecules 38:1850–1858Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Epps TH, Delongchamp DM, Fasolka MJ, Fischer DA, Jablonski EL (2007) Substrate surface energy dependent morphology and dewetting in an ABC triblock copolymer film. Langmuir 23:3355–3362Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roskov KE, Epps TH, Berry BC, Hudson SD, Tureau MS, Fasolka MJ (2008) Preparation of combinatorial arrays of polymer thin films for transmission electron microscopy analysis. J Comb Chem 10:966–973Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Julthongpiput D, Fasolka MJ, Zhang WH, Nguyen T, Amis EJ (2005) Gradient chemical micropatterns: a reference substrate for surface nanometrology. Nano Lett 5:1535–1540Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Julthongpiput D, Zhang W, Douglas JF, Karim A, Fasolka MJ (2007) Pattern-directed to isotropic dewetting transition in polymer films on micropatterned surfaces with differential surface energy contrast. Soft Matter 3:613–618Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gallant ND, Lavery KA, Amis EJ, Becker ML (2007) Universal chemistry for “Click” chemistry biofunctionalization. Adv Mater 19:072207Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless BK (2001) Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed 40:2004–2021Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lin-Gibson S, Landis FA, Drzal PL (2006) Combinatorial investigation of the structure-properties characterization of photopolymerized dimethacrylate networks. Biomaterials 27:1711–1717Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lin NJ, Drzal PL, Lin-Gibson S (2007) Two-dimensional gradient platforms for rapid assessment of dental polymers: a chemical, mechanical and biological evaluation. Dent Mater 23:1211–1220Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johnson PM, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN (2007) Photopolyrner kinetics using light intensity gradients in high-throughput conversion analysis. Polymer 48:6319–6324Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johnson PM, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN (2008) High-throughput kinetic analysis of acrylate and thiol-ene photopolymerization using temperature and temperature and exposure time gradients. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 46:1502–1509Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Johnson PM, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN (2008) Kinetic modeling of a comonomer photopolymerization system using high-throughput conversion data. Macromolecules 41:230–237Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Matyjaszewski K, Miller PJ, Shukla N, Immaraporn B, Gelman A, Luokala BB, Siclovan TM, Kickelbick G, Vallant T, Hoffmann H, Pakula T (1999) Polymers at interfaces: using atom transfer radical polymerization in the controlled growth of homopolymers and block copolymers from silicon surfaces in the absence of untethered sacrificial initiator Macromolecules 32:8716–8724Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Husseman M, Malmstrom EE, McNamara M, Mate M, Mecerreyes D, Benoit DG, Hedrick JL, Mansky P, Huang E, Russell TP, Hawker CJ (1999) Controlled synthesis of polymer brushes by “Living” free radical polymerization techniques. Macromolecules 32:1424–1431Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bhat RR, Tomlinson MR, Genzer J (2005) Orthogonal surface-grafted polymer gradients: a versatile combinatorial platform. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 43:3384–3394Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Genzer J, Bhat RR (2008) Surface-bound soft matter gradients. Langmuir 24(6):2294–2317Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wu T, Efimenko K, Genzer J (2002) Combinatorial study of the mushroom-to-brush crossover in surface anchored polyacrylamide. J Am Chem Soc 124:9394–9395Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wu T, Efimenko K, Vlcek P, Subr V, Genzer J (2003) Formation and properties of anchored polymers with a gradual variation of grafting densities on flat substrates. Macromolecules 36:2448–2453Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhao B, Brittain WJ (2000) Polymer brushes: surface-immobilized macromolecules. Prog Polym Sci 25:677–710Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Patten TE, Matyjaszewski K (1998) Atom transfer radical polymerization and the synthesis of polymeric materials. Adv Mater 10:901Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mendes PM (2008) Stimuli-responsive surfaces for bio-applications. Chem Soc Rev 37:2512–2529Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    La WH, Wang RM, He YF, Zhang HF (2008) Preparation and application of smart coatings. Prog Polym Chem 20:351–361Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Patten TE, Xia JH, Abernathy T, Matyjaszewski K (1996) Polymers with very low polydispersities from atom transfer radical polymerization. Science 272:866–868Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Prucker O, Ruhe J (1998) Synthesis of poly(styrene) monolayers attached to high surface area silica gels through self-assembled monolayers of azo initiators. Macromolecules 31:592–601Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Prucker O, Ruhe J (1998) Polymer layers through self-assembled monolayers of initiators. Langmuir 14:6893–6898Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu C, Wu T, Drain CM, Batteas JD, Beers KL (2005) Microchannel confined surface-initiated polymerization. Macromolecules 38:6Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Xu C, Wu T, Batteas JD, Drain CM, Beers KL, Fasolka MJ (2006) Surface-grafted block copolymer gradients: effect of block length on solvent response. Appl Surf Sci 252:2529–2534Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xu C, Wu T, Drain CM, Batteas JD, Fasolka MJ, Beers KL (2006) Effect of block length on solvent response of block copolymer brushes: combinatorial study with block copolymer brush gradients. Macromolecules 39:3359–3364Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mei Y, Wu T, Xu C, Langenbach KJ, Elliott JT, Vogt BD, Beers KL, Amis EJ, Washburn NR (2005) Tuning cell adhesion on gradient poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-grafted surfaces. Langmuir 21:12309–12314Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Xu C, Barnes SE, Wu T, Fischer DA, DeLongchamp DM, Batteas JD, Beers KL (2006) Solution and surface gradients via microfluidic confinement: fabrication of a statistical copolymer brush composition gradient. Adv Mater 18:1427Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhao B (2004) A combinatorial approach to study solvent-induced self-assembly of mixed poly(methyl methacrylate)/polystyrene brushes on planar silica substrates: effect of relative grafting density. Langmuir 20:11748–11755Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Patton DL, Page KA, Xu C, Genson KL, Fasolka MJ, Beers KL (2007) Measurement of reactivity ratios in surface-initiated radical copolymerization. Macromolecules 40:6017–6020Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhao JC (2006) Combinatorial approaches as effective tools in the study of phase diagrams and composition-structure-property relationships. Prog Mater Sci 51:557–631Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Karim A, Yurekli K, Meredith C, Amis EJ, Krishnamoorti R (2002) Combinatorial methods for polymer materials science: phase behavior of nanocomposite blend films. Polym Eng Sci 42:1836–1840Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Meredith JC, Sormana JL, Keselowsky BG, Garcia AJ, Tona A, Karim A, Amis EJ (2003) Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 66A:483–490Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Simon CG Jr, Stephens JS, Dorsey SM, Becker ML (2007) Fabrication of combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries. Rev Sci Instrum 78:0722071Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yang Y, Dorsey SM, Becker ML, Lin-Gibson S, Schumacher GE, Flaim GM, Kohn J, Simon CG Jr (2008) X-ray imaging optimization of 3D tissue engineering scaffolds via combinatorial fabrication methods. Biomaterials 29:1901–1911Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kramer EJ (1983) Microscopic and molecular fundamentals of crazing. Adv Polym Sci 52/53:1–56Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lauterwasser BD, Kramer EJ (1979) Microscopic mechanisms and mechanics of craze growth and fracture. Philos Mag A Phys Condens Matter Struct Defects Mech Prop 39:469–495Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Crosby AJ, Fasolka MJ, Beers KL (2004) High-throughput craze studies in gradient thin films using ductile copper grids. Macromolecules 37:9968–9974Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Stafford CM, Guo S, Harrison C, Chiang MYM (2005) Combinatorial and high-throughput measurements of the modulus of thin polymer films. Rev Sci Instrum 76:062207Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Stafford CM, Harrison C, Beers KL, Karim A, Amis EJ, Vanlandingham MR, Kim HC, Volksen W, Miller RD, Simonyi EE (2004) A buckling-based metrology for measuring the elastic moduli of polymeric thin films. Nat Mater 3:545–550Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke EA (1999) Polymer handbook, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Stafford CM, Vogt BD, Harrison C, Julthongpiput D, Huang R (2006) Elastic Moduli of ultrathin amorphous polymer films. Macromolecules 39:5095–5099Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Nolte AJ, Cohen RE, Rubner MF (2006) A two-plate buckling technique for thin film modulus measurements: applications to polyelectrolyte multilayers. Macromolecules 39:4841–4847Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Nolte AJ, Rubner MF, Cohen RE (2005) Determining the Young’s modulus of polyelectrolyte multilayer films via stress-induced mechanical buckling instabilities. Macromolecules 38:5367–5370Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nolte AJ, Treat ND, Cohen RE, Rubner MF (2008) Effect of relative humidity on the Young’s modulus of polyelectrolyte multilayer films and related nonionic polymers. Macromolecules 41:5793–5798Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Huang H, Chung JY, Nolte AJ, Stafford CM (2007) Characterizing polymer brushes via surface wrinkling. Chem Mater 19:6555–6560Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Khang DY, Xiao JL, Kocabas C, MacLaren S, Banks T, Jiang HQ, Huang YYG, Rogers JA (2008) Molecular scale buckling mechanics on individual aligned single-wall carbon nanotubes on elastomeric substrates. Nano Lett 8:124–130Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wilder EA, Guo S, Lin-Gibson S, Fasolka MJ, Stafford CM (2006) Measuring the modulus of soft polymer networks via a buckling-based metrology. Macromolecules 39:4138–4143Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chisholm B, Potyrailo R, Cawse J, Shaffer R, Brennan M, Molaison C, Whisenhunt D, Flanagan B, Olson D, Akhave J, Saunders D, Mehrabi A, Licon M (2002) The development of combinatorial chemistry methods for coating development – I. Overview of the experimental factory. Prog Org Coat 45:313–321Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Crosby AJ (2003) Combinatorial characterization of polymer adhesion. J Mater Sci 38:4439–4449Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Chiche A, Zhang WH, Stafford CM, Karim A (2005) A new design for high-throughput peel tests: statistical analysis and example. Meas Sci Technol 16:183–190Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    McGuiggan PM, Chiche A, Filliben JJ, Phelan FR, Fasolka MJ, Yarusso DJ (2006) High-throughput peel measurement of a pressure-sensitive adhesive. Adhes Mag 13:32–39Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Grunlan JC, Holguin DL, Chuang HK, Perez I, Chavira A, Quilatan R, Akhave J, Mehrabi AR (2004) Combinatorial development of pressure-sensitive adhesives. Macromol Rapid Commun 25(1):286–291Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Moon SH, Chiche A, Forster AM, Zhang WH, Stafford CM (2005) Evaluation of temperature-dependent adhesive performance via combinatorial probe tack measurements. Rev Sci Instrum 76:062210Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Chisholm B, Potyrailo R, Shaffer R, Cawse J, Brennan M, Molaison C (2003) Combinatorial chemistry methods for coating development III. Development of a high-throughput screening method for abrasion resistance: correlation with conventional methods and the effects of abrasion mechanism. Prog Org Coat 47:112–119Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Chisholm BJ, Potyrailo RA, Cawse JN, Shaffer RE, Brennan M, Molaison CA (2003) Combinatorial chemistry methods for coating development V. The importance of understanding process capability. Prog Org Coat 47:120–127Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Shaffer EO, McGarry FJ, Hoang L (1996) Designing reliable polymer coatings. Polym Eng Sci 36:2375–2381Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Chiang MYM, Wu WL, He JM, Amis EJ (2003) Combinatorial approach to the edge-delamination test for thin film reliability – concept and simulation. Thin Solid Films 437:197–203Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Chiang MYM, Song R, Crosby AJ, Karim A, Chiang CK, Amis EJ (2005) Combinatorial approach to the edge-delamination test for thin film reliability – adaptability and variability. Thin Solid Films 476:379–385Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Stafford CM, Kim JH, Kawaguchi D, Royston G, Chiang MYM (2006) Probing the interfacial adhesion strength in compositional libraries of epoxy films. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 894:129–137Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD (1971) Surface energy and contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 324:301Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Crosby AJ, Karim A, Amis EJ (2003) Combinatorial investigations of interfacial failure. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 41:883–891Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Forster AM, Zhang WH, Crosby AJ, Stafford CM (2005) A multilens measurement platform for high-throughput adhesion measurements. Meas Sci Technol 16:81–89Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Nolte AJ, Chung JY, Walker ML, Stafford CM (2009) In-situ adhesion measurements utilizing layer-by-layer functionalized surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1:373–380Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Hessel V, Serra C, Loewe GH, Hadziioannou G (2005) Polymerizations in micro-structured reactors: overview. Chem Ing Tech 77:1693Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Iwasaki T, Yoshida J (2005) Free radical polymerization in microreactors. Significant improvement in molecular weight distribution control. Macromolecules 38:1159–1163Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Harrison C, Cabral J, Stafford CM, Karim A, Amis EJ (2004) A rapid prototyping technique for the fabrication of solvent-resistant structures. J Micromech Microeng 14:153–158Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Cygan ZT, Cabral JT, Beers KL, Amis EJ (2005) Microfluidic platform for the generation of organic-phase microreactors. Langmuir 21:3629–3634Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Chastek TQ, Iida K, Amis EJ, Fasolka MJ, Beers KL (2008) A microfluidic platform for integrated synthesis and dynamic light scattering measurement of block copolymer micelles. Lab Chip 8:950Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Wu T, Mei Y, Cabral JT, Xu C, Beers KL (2004) A new synthetic method for controlled polymerization using a microfluidic system. J Am Chem Soc 126:7881Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Wu T, Mei Y, Xu C, Byrd HCM, Beers KL (2005) Block copolymer PEO-b-PHPMA synthesis using controlled radical polymerization on a chip. Macromol Rapid Commun 26:1037Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Chastek TQ, Iida K, Amis EJ, Fasolka MJ, Beers KL (2008) A microfluidic platform for integrated synthesis and dynamic light scattering measurement of block copolymer micelles. Lab Chip 8:950–957Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Iida K, Chastek TQ, Beers KL, Cavicchi KA, Chun J, Fasolka MJ (2009) Living anionic polymerization using a microfluidic reactor. Lab Chip 9:339–345Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Chastek TQ, Beers KL, Amis EJ (2007) Miniaturized dynamic light scattering instrumentation for use in microfluidic applications. Rev Sci Instrum 78:072201Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Jin F, Balasubramaniam R, Stebe KJ (2004) Surfactant adsorption to spherical particles: the intrinsic length-scale governing the shift from diffusion to kinetic-controlled mass transfer. J Adhes 80:773–796Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Hudson SD, Cabral JT, Goodrum WJ, Beers KL, Amis EJ (2005) Microfluidic interfacial tensiometry. Appl Phys Lett 87:081905Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Cabral JT, Hudson SD (2006) Microfluidic approach for rapid multicomponent interfacial tensiometry. Lab Chip 6:427–436Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Fasolka
    • 1
  • Christopher M. Stafford
    • 1
  • Kathryn L. Beers
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials Science and Engineering LaboratoryNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations