Advertisement

Gaining Insights into the Small Molecule Targeting of the G-Quadruplex in the c-MYC Promoter Using NMR and an Allele-Specific Transcriptional Assay

Chapter
Part of the Topics in Current Chemistry book series (TOPCURRCHEM, volume 330)

Abstract

G-quadruplexes (four-stranded DNA secondary structures) are showing promise as new targets for anticancer therapies. Specifically, G-quadruplexes in the proximal promoter region of regulatory genes have the potential to act as silencer elements and thereby turn off transcription. Thus, compounds that are capable of binding to and stabilizing G-quadruplexes would be of great benefit. In this chapter we describe two recent studies from our labs. In the first case, we use NMR to elucidate the structure of a 2:1 complex between a small molecule and the G-quadruplex in the c-MYC promoter. In the second case, we use an allele-specific transcription assay to demonstrate that the effect of a G-quadruplex-interactive compound is mediated directly through the G-quadruplex. Finally, we use this information to propose models for the interaction of various small molecules with the c-MYC G-quadruplex.

Keywords

G-quadruplex c-MYC gene regulation NMR structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (CA153821 [LHH] and 1S10 RR16659 and CA122952 [DY]) and the National Foundation for Cancer Research (VONHOFF0601 [LHH]). We are grateful to Dr. David Bishop for preparation, proofreading, and editing of the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Kohn KW (1996) Beyond DNA cross-linking: history and prospects of DNA-targeted cancer treatment—fifteenth Bruce F. Cain Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Res 56:5533–5546Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balasubramanian S, Hurley LH, Neidle S (2011) Targeting G-quadruplexes in gene promoters: a novel anticancer strategy? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huppert JL, Balasubramanian S (2007) G-quadruplexes in promoters throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 35:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sen D, Gilbert W (1988) Formation of parallel four-stranded complexes by guanine-rich motifs in DNA and its implications for meiosis. Nature 334:364–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sundquist WI, Klug A (1989) Telomeric DNA dimerizes by formation of guanine tetrads between hairpin loops. Nature 342:825–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zahler AM, Williamson JR, Cech TR, Prescott DM (1991) Inhibition of telomerase by G-quartet DNA structures. Nature 350:718–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun D, Thompson B, Cathers BE, Salazar M, Kerwin SM, Trent JO, Jenkins TC, Neidle S, Hurley LH (1997) Inhibition of human telomerase by a G-quadruplex-interactive compound. J Med Chem 40:2113–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huppert JL, Balasubramanian S (2005) Prevalence of quadruplexes in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 33:2908–2916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kikin O, D’Antonio L, Bagga PS (2006) QGRS Mapper: a web-based server for predicting G-quadruplexes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W676–W682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Todd AK, Johnston M, Neidle S (2005) Highly prevalent putative quadruplex sequence motifs in human DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 33:2901–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huppert JL, Bugaut A, Kumari S, Balasubramanian S (2008) G-quadruplexes: the beginning and end of UTRs. Nucleic Acids Res 36:6260–6268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xie X, Lu J, Kulbokas EJ, Golub TR, Mootha V, Lindblad-Toh K, Lander ES, Kellis M (2005) Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3′ UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature 434:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kouzine F, Sanford S, Elisha-Feil Z, Levens D (2008) The functional response of upstream DNA to dynamic supercoiling in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun D, Hurley LH (2009) The importance of negative superhelicity in inducing the formation of G-quadruplex and i-motif structures in the c-Myc promoter: implications for drug targeting and control of gene expression. J Med Chem 52:2863–2874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brooks TA, Kendrick S, Hurley L (2010) Making sense of G-quadruplex and i-motif functions in oncogene promoters. FEBS J 277:3459–3469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu Z, Gaerig V, Cui Y, Kang H, Gokhale V, Zhao Y, Hurley LH, Mao H (2012) Tertiary DNA structure in the single-stranded hTERT promoter fragment unfolds and refolds by parallel pathways via cooperative or sequential events. J Am Chem Soc 134:5157–5164Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown RV, Danford FL, Gokhale V, Hurley LH, Brooks TA (2011) Demonstration that drug-targeted down-regulation of MYC in non-Hodgkins lymphoma is directly mediated through the promoter G-quadruplex. J Biol Chem 286:41018–41027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brooks TA, Hurley LH (2009) The role of supercoiling in transcriptional control of MYC and its importance in molecular therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 9:849–861Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brooks TA, Hurley LH (2010) Targeting MYC expression through G-quadruplexes. Genes Cancer 1:641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michelotti GA, Michelotti EF, Pullner A, Duncan RC, Eick D, Levens D (1996) Multiple single-stranded cis elements are associated with activated chromatin of the human c-myc gene in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 16:2656–2669Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mathur V, Verma A, Maiti S, Chowdhury S (2004) Thermodynamics of i-tetraplex formation in the nuclease hypersensitive element of human c-myc promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 320:1220–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simonsson T, Pecinka P, Kubista M (1998) DNA tetraplex formation in the control region of c-myc. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1167–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soucek L, Whitfield J, Martins CP, Finch AJ, Murphy DJ, Sodir NM, Karnezis AN, Swigart LB, Nasi S, Evan GI (2008) Modelling myc inhibition as a cancer therapy. Nature 455:679–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dai J, Carver M, Hurley LH, Yang D (2011) Solution structure of a 2:1 quindoline–c-MYC G-quadruplex: insights into G-quadruplex-interactive small molecule drug design. J Am Chem Soc 133:17673–17680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ambrus A, Chen D, Dai J, Jones RA, Yang D (2005) Solution structure of the biologically relevant G-quadruplex element in the human c-MYC promoter. Implications for G-quadruplex stabilization. Biochemistry 44:2048–2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang D, Okamoto K (2010) Structural insights into G-quadruplexes: towards new anticancer drugs. Future Med Chem 2:619–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guyen B, Schultes CM, Hazel P, Mann J, Neidle S (2004) Synthesis and evaluation of analogues of 10H-indolo[3,2-b]quinoline as G-quadruplex stabilising ligands and potential inhibitors of the enzyme telomerase. Org Biomol Chem 2:981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhou J-L, Lu Y-J, Ou T-M, Zhou J-M, Huang Z-S, Zhu X-F, Du C-J, Bu X-Z, Ma L, Gu L-Q, Li Y-M, Chan AS-C (2005) Synthesis and evaluation of quindoline derivatives as G-quadruplex inducing and stabilizing ligands and potential inhibitors of telomerase. J Med Chem 48:7315–7321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ou TM, Lu YJ, Zhang C, Huang ZS, Wang XD, Tan JH, Chen Y, Ma DL, Wong KY, Tang JC, Chan AS, Gu LQ (2007) Stabilization of G-quadruplex DNA and down-regulation of oncogene c-myc by quindoline derivatives. J Med Chem 50:1465–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mandal M, Breaker RR (2004) Gene regulation by riboswitches. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:451–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shin-ya K, Wierzba K, Matsuo K, Ohtani T, Yamada Y, Furihata K, Hayakawa Y, Seto H (2001) Telomestatin, a novel telomerase inhibitor from Streptomyces anulatus. J Am Chem Soc 123:1262–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Han FX, Wheelhouse RT, Hurley LH (1999) Interactions of TMPyP4 and TMPyP2 with quadruplex DNA. Structural basis for the differential effects on telomerase inhibition. J Am Chem Soc 121:3561–3570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Neidle S (2009) The structures of quadruplex nucleic acids and their drug complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Phan AT, Kuryavyi V, Gaw HY, Patel DJ (2005) Small-molecule interaction with a five-guanine-tract G-quadruplex structure from the human MYC promoter. Nat Chem Biol 1:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Siddiqui-Jain A, Grand CL, Bearss DJ, Hurley LH (2002) Direct evidence for a G-quadruplex in a promoter region and its targeting with a small molecule to repress c-MYC transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11593–11598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Campbell NH, Parkinson GN, Reszka AP, Neidle S (2008) Structural basis of DNA quadruplex recognition by an acridine drug. J Am Chem Soc 130:6722–6724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haider SM, Parkinson GN, Neidle S (2003) Structure of a G-quadruplex–ligand complex. J Mol Biol 326:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Qin Y, Hurley LH (2008) Structures, folding patterns, and functions of intramolecular DNA G-quadruplexes found in eukaryotic promoter regions. Biochimie 90:1149–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kang HJ, Park HJ (2009) Novel molecular mechanism for actinomycin D activity as an oncogenic promoter G-quadruplex binder. Biochemistry 48:7392–7398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dexheimer TS, Carey SS, Zuohe S, Gokhale VM, Hu X, Murata LB, Maes EM, Weichsel A, Sun D, Meuillet EJ, Montfort WR, Hurley LH (2009) NM23-H2 may play an indirect role in transcriptional activation of c-myc gene expression but does not cleave the nuclease hypersensitive element III1. Mol Cancer Ther 8:1363–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    González V, Hurley LH (2010) The c-MYC NHE III1: function and regulation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 50:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    González V, Hurley LH (2010) The C-terminus of nucleolin promotes the formation of the c-MYC G-quadruplex and inhibits c-MYC promoter activity. Biochemistry 49:9706–9714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Drygin D, Siddiqui-Jain A, O’Brien S, Schwaebe M, Lin A, Bliesath J, Ho CB, Proffitt C, Trent K, Whitten JP, Lim JK, Von Hoff D, Anderes K, Rice WG (2009) Anticancer activity of CX-3543: a direct inhibitor of rRNA biogenesis. Cancer Res 69:7653–7661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of PharmacyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Arizona Cancer CenterTucsonUSA
  3. 3.BIO5 InstituteTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations