A Self-adapting System Generating Intentional Behavior and Emotions

  • Alain Cardon
  • Jean-Charles Campagne
  • Mickaël Camus
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3825)


We tackle the notion of self-adaptive systems in an organizational way as complex systems with strong motivated autonomous behavior leading to the emotions. The main applications of such systems are in autonomous robots. We show that we need a new approach to build such systems where we use an adaptive construction grounded on software organizations of agents, using inner loops like the feedback loops of electronic, but in the agent world. The management of the activations loops by the system itself, using the notion of shape of the loops, expresses the concept computable concept of emotion.


Multiagent System Agent Group Software Agent Data Processing System Agent Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Brooks 1991]
    Brooks, R.: Intelligence without reason. In: Proc. of the 1991 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 569–591 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. [Campagne 04]
    Campagne, J.C., Cardon, A.: Using Morphology to Analyse and Steer Large Multi-Agents Systems at Runtime, Selmas 2004. IEEE, Edinburg (2004)Google Scholar
  3. [Campagne 04]
    Campagne, J.C., Cardon, A., Collomb, E., Nishida, T.: Massive Multi-Agent System Control. In: FAABS III 2004, IEEE Workshop on Formal Approaches on Agentsbased Systems. NASA Goddard Space Center, Greenbelt MA, USA (April 2004)Google Scholar
  4. [Cardon - Lesage 1998]
    Cardon, A., Lesage, F.: Toward Adaptive Information Systems: considering concern and intentionality, KAW 1998, Banff, Canada, Avril 17-23 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. [Cardon 1999]
    Cardon, A.: Conscience artificielle et systèmes adaptatifs. Ed. Eyrolles, Paris (1999)Google Scholar
  6. [Cardon 2004]
    Cardon, A.: Modéliser et concevoir une machine pensante. Ed. Vuibert, Paris (2004)Google Scholar
  7. [Dautenhahn 1997]
    Dautenhahn, K.: Biologically inspired robotic experiments on interaction and dynamic agent-environment coupling. In: Proc. Workshop SOAVE 1997, Ilmenau, September 1997, pp. 14–24 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. [Dretske 1988]
    Dretske, F.: Explaining Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  9. [Freud 1966]
    Freud, S.: The Complete Psychological Works of S. Freud, J. Strachey. The Hogarth Press, London (1966)Google Scholar
  10. [Lesage & al. 1999]
    Lesage, F., Cardon, A., Tranouez, P.: A multiagent based prediction of the evolution of knowledge with multiple points of view, KAW 1999, Octobre 16-22, 1999. Communication publiée dans les actes, Banff (1999)Google Scholar
  11. [Lesage 2000]
    Lesage F., Interprétation adaptative du discours dans une situation multiparticipants : modélisation par agents. Thèse de l’Université du Havre (Décembre 2000)Google Scholar
  12. [Mataric 1995]
    Mataric, M.: Issues and approaches in design of collective autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 16, 321–331 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [Thom 1972]
    Thom, R.: Stabilité structurelle et morphogenèse. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., Reading (1972)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alain Cardon
    • 1
  • Jean-Charles Campagne
    • 1
  • Mickaël Camus
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.LIP6 UMR 7606 Paris VIParis
  2. 2.L.E.R.I.A., {Epitech.}Le Kremlin BicêtreFrance

Personalised recommendations