Survivable Security Systems Through Autonomicity

  • Roy Sterritt
  • Grainne Garrity
  • Edward Hanna
  • Patricia O’Hagan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3825)


Technological developments such as biometrics are providing new potential for next generation security systems. At the same time these developments can make the system more complex to manage. Some classes of systems have a fundamental requirement to survive be that to ensure an organization does not loose tens of millions of dollars due to downtime or to ensure there is not a security breach. Autonomic self-managing systems are motivated to hide the ever increasing complexity in today’s systems but through their selfware approach they also offer the potential to create survivable systems. This paper details one such approach, to create a survivable security system for correction centers.


Autonomic Computing Correction Center Control Console Knowledge Plane Tier Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Horn, P.: Autonomic computing: IBM perspective on the state of information technology IBM T. J. Watson Labs, 15 October (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sterritt, R.: Towards Autonomic Computing: Effective Event Management. In: Proc. IEEE/NASA SEW, Greenbelt, MD (December 2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The Vision of Autonomic Computing. Computer 36(1), 41–52 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sterritt, R.: Autonomic Computing. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering 1(1), 79–88 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sterritt, R., Bantz, D.F.: PAC-MEN: Personal Autonomic Computing Monitoring Environments. In: Proc. IEEE DEXA 2004 Workshops - 2nd Int. Workshop on Self-Adaptive and Autonomic Computing Systems (SAACS 2004), Zaragoza, Spain, August 30 – 3 September, 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaiser, G., Parekh, J., Gross, P., Valetto, G.: Kinesthetics eXtreme: An External Infrastructure for Monitoring Distributed Legacy Systems. In: Autonomic Computing Workshop – IEEE 5th Int. Active Middleware Workshop, Seattle, USA (June 2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lupu, E., et al.: EPSRC AMUSE: Autonomic Management of Ubiquitous Systems for e- Health (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jun, H., Ji, G., Zhongchao, H., Beishui, L., Changyun, L., Jiujun, C.: A New Rational Model for Agent for Autonomic Computing. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 5531–5536 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tamma, V., Blacoe, I., Lithgow Smith, B., Wooldridge, M.: Introducing autonomic behaviour in semantic web agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Galway, Ireland (November 2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sterritt, R., Hinchey, M.G.: Birds of a Feather Session: Autonomic Computing: Panacea or Poppycock? In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on the Engineering of Autonomic Systems (EASe 2005) at 12th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS 2005) Greenbelt, MD, USA, 3-8 April, pp. 335–341 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simon, H.A.: Motivational and emotional controls of cognition’. Reprinted in Models of Thought, pp. 29–38. Yale University Press (1967)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norman, D.A., Ortony, A., Russell, D.M.: Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines. IBM Systems Journal 42(1), 38–44 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sloman, A., Croucher, M.: Why Robots Will Have Emotions. In: Proc. 7th International Joint Conference on AI, Vancouver, pp. 197–202 (1981)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sloman, A.: Review of: Rosalind Picard’s Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997); AI Magazine (1999) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark, D., Partridge, C., Ramming, J.C., Wroclawski, J.T.: A Knowledge Plane for the Internet. In: Proc. Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, Karlsruhe, ACM SIGCOMM (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lewandowski, S.M., Van Hook, D.J., O’Leary, G.C., Haines, J.W., Rossey, L.M.: SARA: Survivable Autonomic Response Architecture. In: DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition II Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 77–88 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Truszkowski, W., Hallock, L., Rouff, C., Karlin, J., Rash, J., Hinchey, M.G., Sterritt, R.: Autonomous and Autonomic Systems with Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) (in preparation)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    IBM. An architectural blueprint for autonomic computing (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sterritt, R., Bustard, D.W.: Autonomic Computing: a Means of Achieving Dependability? In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS 2003), Huntsville, Alabama, USA, April 7-11, 2003, pp. 247–251 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sterritt, R., Garrity, G., Hanna, E., O’Hagan, P.: Autonomic Agents for Survivable Security Systems. In: Enokido, T., Yan, L., Xiao, B., Kim, D.Y., Dai, Y.-S., Yang, L.T. (eds.) EUC-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3823, pp. 1235–1244. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy Sterritt
    • 1
  • Grainne Garrity
    • 1
  • Edward Hanna
    • 2
  • Patricia O’Hagan
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computing and MathematicsUniversity of UlsterNorthern Ireland
  2. 2.Core SystemsBelfastNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations