Advertisement

Concept and Sensor Network Approach to Computing: The Lexicon Acquisition Component

  • Jan Smid
  • Marek Obitko
  • Andrej Bencur
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3825)

Abstract

In this paper, we describe an on-going project called Concept and Sensor Networks (CSN). The development of this project has been described and discussed in past PSMP workshops [1]. The purpose of the project is to develop a framework for entities that can process sensor information into concepts. One of the features of this proposed network is the ability for the entities to use language communication to exchange concepts. These entities can potentially represent concepts, knowledge and information using different kinds of semantics. To further this project, we will to implement the proposed framework using physical and virtual sensors. In this paper, we overview the key components of the project, primarily focusing on lexical acquisition and the corresponding algorithm.

Keywords

Sensor Network System Tolerance Virtual Sensor Semantic Match Process Sensor Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    PSMP (Knowledge Presentation Sharing, Mining and Protection) Workshop Series Website (2003-2005), http://sks99.com/psmp.php
  2. 2.
    Bencur, A., Pokorny, J., Smid, J.: Communication of Autonomous Systems Based On Wireless Sensor Motes. In: The 7th WSEAS, Prague (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: A Survey on Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smid, J., Obitko, M., Snasel, V.: Semantically Based Knowledge Representation. Communications in Computing (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crossbow Technology Inc. Website, http://www.xbow.com/
  6. 6.
    Paralax Website, http://www.parallax.com/
  7. 7.
    Siteplayer Website, http://siteplayer.com/
  8. 8.
    Siskind, J.: Learning Word-to-meaning Mapping. In: Broeder, P., Murre, J. (eds.) Models of Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackworth, A.K.: Constraint Satisfaction. In: Shapiro, S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 205–211. John Wiley, Chichester (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gold, E.M.: Language Identification in the Limit. Information and Control 10, 447–474 (1967)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley, London (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dale, R., Moisl, H., Somers, H.: Handbook of Natural Language Processing.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ullman, J.D.: Principles of Database and Knowledge-based Systems, vol. I, II. Computer Science Press (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson, P.C.: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence, 2nd Enlarged edn. Dover Publications, Mineola (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poole, D., Mackworth, A.K., Goelble, R.: Computational Intelligence: A logical Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baum, E.B.: What Is Thought? The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Smid
    • 1
  • Marek Obitko
    • 2
  • Andrej Bencur
    • 3
  1. 1.SKS EnterprisesFinksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of CyberneticsCzech Technical UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Measurement and ControlVSB – Technical University OstravaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations