A Systemic Framework for Open Software Agents

  • Eric Sanchis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3825)


The systemic theory associates open systems and complexity closely. This article presents a particular articulation between these two concepts using the Systemion Model. Two types of opening are defined, characterized and illustrated using examples.


Physical Opening Multiagent System Mobile Agent Choice Module Software Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Auyang, S.Y.: Foundations of Complex-System Theories in Economics, Evolutionary Biology, And Statistical Physics, Cambridge, UK (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    von Bertalanffy, L.: The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science 111, 23–29 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    von Bertalanffy, L.: General System Theory. George Braziller, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eriksson, D.M.: A Principal Exposition of Jean-Louis Le Moigne’s Systemic Theory. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 4(2-3) (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franklin, S., Graesser, A.: Is it an Agent, or just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents. In: Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ECAI-WS 1996 and ATAL 1996. LNCS, vol. 1193. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hewitt, C.: Offices Are Open Systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4(3), 271–287 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hexmoor, H., Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (eds.): Agent Autonomy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jennings, N., Wooldridge, M.: Applications of Intelligent Agents. In: Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications, and Markets. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jennings, N., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.: A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 275–306. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The Vision of Autonomic Computing. IEEE Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milojicic, D.: Trend Wars – Mobile agent applications. IEEE Concurrency, 80–90 (September 1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Le Moigne, J.L.: La théorie du système général – Théorie de la modélisation. Ed. PUF, Paris (1977)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parunak, H.V.D., Breuckner, S., Sauter, J.: A Preliminary Taxonomy of Multi-Agent Interaction. In: Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P., Odell, J.J. (eds.) AOSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2935. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanchis, E.: Designing new Agent Based Applications Architectures with the AGP Methodology. In: Proceedings of the twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE 2003). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolfram, S.: Universality and Complexity in Cellular Automata. Physica D 10, 1–35 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Sanchis
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Gestion et CognitionIUT Ponsan – Université Paul SabatierToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations