GAP-RBF Based NR Image Quality Measurement for JPEG Coded Images

  • R. Venkatesh Babu
  • S. Suresh
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4338)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a growing and pruning radial basis function based no-reference (NR) image quality model for JPEG-coded images. The quality of the images are estimated without referring to their original images. The features for predicting the perceived image quality are extracted by considering key human visual sensitivity factors such as edge amplitude, edge length, background activity and background luminance. Image quality estimation involves computation of functional relationship between HVS features and subjective test scores. Here, the problem of quality estimation is transformed to a function approximation problem and solved using GAP-RBF network. GAP-RBF network uses sequential learning algorithm to approximate the functional relationship. The computational complexity and memory requirement are less in GAP-RBF algorithm compared to other batch learning algorithms. Also, the GAP-RBF algorithm finds a compact image quality model and does not require retraining when the new image samples are presented. Experimental results prove that the GAP-RBF image quality model does emulate the mean opinion score (MOS). The subjective test results of the proposed metric are compared with JPEG no-reference image quality index as well as full-reference structural similarity image quality index and it is observed to outperform both.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, Z., Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C.: No-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG compressed images. In: Proc. ICIP 2002, vol. 1, pp. 477–480 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karunasekera, S.A., Kingsbury, N.G.: A distortion measure for blocking artifacts in images based on human visual sensitivity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 4, 713–724 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, H.R., Yuen, M.: A generalized block-edge impairment metric for video coding. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 70(3), 247–278 (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suthaharan, S.: A perceptually significant block-edge impairment metric for digital video coding. In: Proc. ICASSP 2003, Hong Kong, vol. 3, pp. 681–684 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao, W., Mermer, C., Kim, Y.: A de-blocking algorithm and a blockiness metric for highly compressed images. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 12, 1150–1159 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG) website: http://www.vqeg.org
  7. 7.
    JPEG official site: http://www.jpeg.org/
  8. 8.
    Meesters, L., Martens, J.B.: A single-ended blockiness measure for JPEG-coded images. Signal Processing 82, 369–387 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babu, V., Perkis, A.: An HVS-based no-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG coded images using neural networks. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP 2005), Genova, Italy, pp. 433–436 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karayiannis, N.B., Mi, G.W.: Growing radial basis neural networks: Merging supervised and unsupervised learning with network growth techniques. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks 8, 1492–1506 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yingwei, L., Sundararajan, N., Saratchandran, P.: A sequental learning scheme for function approximation using minimal radial basis function (RBF) neural networks. Neural Computation 9, 461–478 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang, G.-B., Saratchandran, P., Sundararajan, N.: An efficient sequential learning algorithm for growing and pruning RBF (GAP-RBF) networks. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernautics: Part-B Cybernautics 34, 2284–2292 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 3, 600–612 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheikh, H.R., Wang, Z., Cormack, L., Bovik, A.C.: (Live image quality assessment database) http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality
  15. 15.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Lu, L.: Why is image quality assessment so difficult? In: Proc. ICASSP 2002, vol. 4, pp. 3313–3316 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Venkatesh Babu
    • 1
  • S. Suresh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.School of EEENanyang Technological UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations