The Effect of User Factors on Consumer Familiarity with Health Terms: Using Gender as a Proxy for Background Knowledge About Gender-Specific Illnesses
An algorithm estimating vocabulary complexity of a consumer health text can help improve readability of consumer health materials. We had previously developed and validated an algorithm predicting lay familiarity with health terms on the basis of the terms’ frequency in consumer health texts and experimental data. Present study is part of the program studying the influence of reader factors on familiarity with health terms and concepts. Using gender as a proxy for background knowledge, the study evaluates male and female participants’ familiarity with terms and concepts pertaining to three types of health topics: male-specific, female-specific and gender-neutral. Of the terms / concepts of equal predicted difficulty, males were more familiar with those pertaining to neutral and male-specific topics (the effect was especially pronounced for “difficult” terms); no topic effect was observed for females. The implications for tailoring health readability formulas to various target populations are discussed.
Keywordsconsumer health informatics readability formulas consumer health vocabularies
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., Sa, E.R.: Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. In: JAMA 2002, May 22-29, vol. 287(20), pp. 2691–2700 (2002)Google Scholar
- 2.Berland, G.K., Elliott, M.N., Morales, L.S., et al.: Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. In: JAMA 2001, May 23-30, vol. 285(20), pp. 2612–2621 (2001)Google Scholar
- 3.Flesch, J.R., Kincaid, C.: Flesch-Kincaid Readability Formula. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1965)Google Scholar
- 5.Zeng, Q., Tse, T., Crowell, J., Divita, G., Roth, L., Browne, A.C.: Identifying consumer-friendly display (CFD) names for health concepts. In: Proc. AMIA Symp. 2005, pp. 859–863 (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Keselman, A., Tse, T., Crowell, J., Browne, A., Ngo, L., Zeng, Q.: Assessing Consumer Health Vocabulary Familiarity: An Exploratory Study. In: Proc. MEDNET 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Langer, J.A.: Examining Background Knowledge and Text Comprehension Reading Research Quarterly 19(4), 468–481 (1984)Google Scholar
- 9.Anderson, R.C., Freebody, P.: Vocabulary knowledge. In: Guthrie, J.T. (ed.) Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews. International Reading Association, Newark (1981)Google Scholar
- 11.Lee, S.-Y.D., Bender, D.E., Ruiz, R.E., Cho, Y.I.: Development of an easy-to-use Spanish health literacy test. Health Serv. Res. 41(4), 1392–1412 (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Davis, T.C., Long, S.W., Jackson, R.H., Mayeaux, E.J., George, R.B., Murphy, P.W., et al.: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam. Med. 25(6), 391–395 (1993)Google Scholar
- 14.Bull, M.J.: Interventions for women as family caregivers. Annu. Rev. Nurs. Res. 19, 125–142 (2001)Google Scholar