Advertisement

Dynamic Anchor Based Mobility Management Scheme for Mobile IP Networks

  • Jae-Pil Yoo
  • Kee-Cheon Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4330)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a dynamic anchor based mobility management scheme for mobile networks, in which different hierarchies are dynamically set up for different users and the multiple tunnels are converged into a single tunnel when lifetime refreshes without excessive packet loss. To justify the effectiveness of our proposed scheme, we made an analytic model to evaluate the signaling cost and handoff delay compared with legacy schemes. Our performance result shows that the proposed dynamic anchor based mobility management scheme can reduce the system signaling cost and has shorter handoff delay under various scenarios.

Keywords

Mobility Agent Mobile Host Home Agent Anchor Node Random Walk Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Solomon, J.: Applicability Statement for IP Mobility Support. IEFT RFC (October 1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perkins, C.E.: IP Mobility Support. RFC 3344 (August 2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaskar, H. (ed.): Requirements of a QoS Solution for Mobile IP. IETF Internet-Draft (July 2002), draft-ietf- mobileip-qos- requirements- 03.txtGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perkins, C.E., Wang, K.Y.: Optimized smooth handoffs in Mobile IP. In: IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communications, pp. 340–346 (July 1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campbell, A., Gomez, J., Wan, C.-Y., Kim, S.: Cellular IP (January 2000), draft-ietf-mobileip-cellularip-00.txtGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, G., Suryakumar, N.: Cellular IP Performance. IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking 3, 2081–2085 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell, A.T., Gomez, J., Kim, S., Valko, A.G., Wan, C.Y., Turanyi, Z.R.: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Cellular IP. EEE Personal Communications 7, 42–49 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell, A.T., Gomez, J., Kim, S., Wan, C.Y., Turanyi, Z.R., Valko, G.: Comparison of IP Micromobility Protocols. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2–12 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramjee, R., La Porta, T., Thuel, S., Varadhan, K., Salgarelli, L.: IP micro-mobility support using HAWAII. Internet Draft (June 1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whsieh, R., Zhou, Z.G., Seneviratne, A.: S-MIP: a seamless handoff architecture for mobile IP. In: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 3, pp. 1774–1784 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    El Malki, K., et al.: Low Latency Handoffs in Mobile IPv4. Internet draft (October 2005), draft-ietf-mobileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-11Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blondia, C., Casals, O., Cerda, L.l., Van den Wijngaert, N., Willems, G., De Cleyn, P.: Performance Comparison of Low Latency Mobile IP schemes. In: Proceedings of WiOpt 2003 INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France, pp. 115–124 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blondia, C., Casals, O., Cerda, L.l., Van den Wijngaert, N., Willems, G., De Cleyn, P.: Low Latency Handoff Mechanisms and their implementation in an IEEE 802.11 Network. ITC (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flademuller, A., De Silva, R.: The effect of Mobile IP handoffs on the performance of TCP. Mobile Networks and Applications 4(2), 131–135 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McNair, J., et al.: A survey of cross-layer performance enhancements for Mobile IP networks. Computer Networks 49, 119–146 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gustafsson, E., Jonsson, A., Perkins, C.E.: Mobile IP Regional Registration, Internet Draft (November 2005), draft-ietf-mobileip-reg- tunnel-01.txtGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Das., S., Misra, A., Agrawal., P., Das, S.K.: TeleMIP:telecommunications-enhanced mobile IP architecture for fast intradomain mobility. IEEE Pers. Commun. 7, 50–58 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J., Madruga, E.: A multicast routing protocol for ad-hoc networks. In: IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 784–792 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rubin, I., Choi, C.: Impact of the location area structure on the performance of signaling channels in wireless cellular networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 108–115 (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zonoozi, M., Dassanayake, P.: User mobility modeling and characterization of mobility patterns. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 15(7), 1239–1252 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae-Pil Yoo
    • 1
  • Kee-Cheon Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science & EngineeringKonkuk UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations