Activation of Knowledge in an Integrated Business Process Support/Knowledge Management System

  • Ilia Bider
  • Lena Johansson
  • Erik Perjons
  • Alexey Striy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4333)


The paper is devoted to the issue of activation of knowledge in automated Knowledge Management Systems (KMS). According to the authors, activation of knowledge means that a system, based on the knowledge stored in it, automatically suggests a solution appropriate for a task at hand and/or guards against the user invoking inappropriate solutions. The paper discusses activation of knowledge, first, in general, and then, in a more specific manner, while applying general concepts to an integrated Business Process Support and Knowledge Management System (BPS/KMS) that is based on the state-oriented view on business processes. Activation of knowledge in such a system is done through rules of planning. The paper presents a classification of such rules, which is based on deontic logic concepts, and shows how rules of different categories can be used for activation of knowledge. The discussion is illustrated by an example already implemented in a working system. Some details of the current implementation of rules of planning are also presented in the paper.


Business Process Knowledge Management Deontic Logic Process Instance Business Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andersson, B., Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Integration of Business Process Support with Knowledge Management - A Practical Perspective. In: Karagiannis, D., Reimer, U. (eds.) PAKM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3336, pp. 227–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersson, B., Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Business Process Support as a Basis for Computerized Knowledge Management. In: Althoff, K.-D., Dengel, A.R., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T.R. (eds.) WM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3782, pp. 542–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersson, T., Bider, I., Svensson, R.: Aligning people to business processes. Experience report. Software Process: Improvement and Practice (SPIP) 10(4), 403–413 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cole, K., Fischer, O., Saltzman, P.: Just-in-time knowledge delivery. Communication of the ACM 40(7), 49–53 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fenstermacher, K.D.: A Process for Delivering Information Just in Time. In: Althoff, K.-D., Dengel, A.R., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T.R. (eds.) WM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3782, pp. 679–687. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hilpinen, R. (ed.): Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Reidel, Dordrechtz (1971)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/IEC 10746-2. Open Distributed Processing, Reference Model, Part 2 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerschberg, K., Jeong, H.: Just-in-Time Knowledge Management. In: Althoff, K.-D., Dengel, A.R., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T.R. (eds.) WM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3782, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khomyakov, M., Bider, I.: Achieving Workflow Flexibility through Taming the Chaos. In: OOIS 2000, pp. 85–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lupu, E., Sloman, M.: A Policy Based Role Object Model. In: Proceedings of EDOC 1997, Gold Cost, Australia, pp. 36–47 (October 1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pavassiliou, G., Ntioudis, S., Abecker, A., Mentzas, G.A.: Supporting Knowledge-Intensive Work in Public Administration Processes. Knowledge and Process Management 10(3), 164–174 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silverman, B.G.: Survey of Expert Critiquing Systems: Practical and Theoretical Frontiers. Communications of the ACM 35, 106–127 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wan-Kadir, W.M.N., Loucopoulos, P.: Relating evolving business rules to software design. Journal of Systems Architecture 50, 367–382 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilia Bider
    • 2
  • Lena Johansson
    • 1
  • Erik Perjons
    • 1
  • Alexey Striy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesRoyal Institute of TechnologyKistaSweden
  2. 2.IbisSoft ABStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations