The Interactive Artwork as the Aesthetic Object: Aesthetic Technology Converging Technological Applications and Aesthetic Discourses

  • Joonsung Yoon
  • Jaehwa Kim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4326)

Abstract

Today the concept of art is studied in the term of aesthetic object. On the one hand, it is noticed that the aesthetic object has changed its form from material into interpretive and semantic entity. On the other hand, the aesthetic experience is shifting its site to the center of aesthetic object. Contemporary computer-based media art works are composed of physical bodies such as computer CPU, monitor, projector, camera and speaker including technologies of computer vision, computer graphics, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, augmented reality, etc. In particular, interactive art not only embodies characteristics of already changed aesthetic object, but also reveals contexts of returning the problem of aesthetic object into the aesthetic perception for the reconsideration. Therefore interactive art is the triggering and motivating point to discuss new aesthetic object in terms of art and science.

Keywords

aesthetic object technolsogy interactive art art and science 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Azuma, R., Billinghurst, M., Hölerer, T., Kato, H., Poupyrev, I., Schmalstieg, D.: Augmented Reality- The interface is everywhere. In: SIGGRAPH course note, Los Angeles, vol. 27 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barthes, R.: Image, Music, Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. Noonday, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolter Jay, D., Gromala, D.: Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency. MIT, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foster, H., Krauss, R., Bois, Y., Buchloh, B.: Art since 1900. Thames & Hudson, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodman, N.: Language of Art. Hackett, Indianapolis (1976)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krueger, M.: Artificial Reality II. Addison Wesley Publishing, Reading (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fishwick, P.A. (ed.): Aesthetic Computing. MIT, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of Perception. In: Trans. Colin Smith., Humanities Press, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suzuki, R., Iwadate, Y., Inoue, M., Woo, W.: MIDAS- MIC Interactive Dance System. In: Proc. IEEE SMC, Kyoto-fu, Japan (October 2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joonsung Yoon
    • 1
  • Jaehwa Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Digital MediaSoongsil Univ.SeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations