Advertisement

Information-Accuracy-Aware Jointly Sensing Nodes Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Huifang Li
  • Shengming Jiang
  • Gang Wei
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4325)

Abstract

A key issue in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is to select a set of sensors to join sensing task under some physical resource constraints while achieving a required information accuracy. This paper introduces a novel idea for information-accuracy-aware jointly sensing nodes selection based on a derived information accuracy model which formulates an explicit relationship between information accuracy and the number and position of jointly sensing nodes. We aim at eliminating the unnecessary transmission to minimize energy consumption while maximizing information accuracy, which is formulated as a joint optimization of information accuracy and energy consumption. In the proposed algorithm, a node is selected to join a sensing task based on its information accuracy gain and consumed energy. This allows a WSN to efficiently distribute sensing tasks given a limited energy supply. Simulation results have demonstrated that our algorithm improves the performance of joint optimization between information accuracy and energy consumption than a random node selection.

Keywords

Wireless Sensor Network Cluster Header Minimum Mean Square Error Cluster Member Event Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: Wireless Sensor networks: A Survey. Computer Networks 38, 393–422 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruiz, L.B., Nogueira, J.M., Loureiro, A.A.F.: MANNA a management architecture for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 41, 125–161 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perillo, M.A., Heinzelman, W.B.: Optimal sensor management under energy and reliability constraints. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, WCNC (2003), New Orleans, USA, March 16-20, pp. 1621–1626 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao, F., Shin, J., Reich, J.: Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 19, 61–72 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, J., Reich, J.E., Zhao, F.: Collaborative in-network processing for target tracking. EURASIP, Journal on Applied Signal Processing 3, 378–391 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goblick, T.J.: Theoretical limitations on the transmission of data from analog sources. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. IT-11 4, C558–C567 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poor, V.: An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berger, J.O., de Oliviera, V., Sanso, B.: Objective Bayesian analysis of spatially correlated data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 96, 1361–1374 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindsey, S., Raghavendra, C.: PEGASIS: power efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In: IEEE Aerospace conference, pp. 1125–1130 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rappaport, T.: Wireless Communications: Principles 4 Practice. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huifang Li
    • 1
  • Shengming Jiang
    • 1
  • Gang Wei
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EIE, SCUTGuangZhouChina

Personalised recommendations