Neuromuscular-Like Control for an Artificial Finger with SMA Actuators

  • Francisco García-Córdova
  • Juan Ignacio Mulero-Martínez
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4304)


In comparison with robot manipulators, primate limbs excel robots in facile movements requiring compliance control. Based on this fact, a neuromuscular-like model that can emulate different involuntary and voluntary movements within constraints from neurophysiology is proposed in this paper. The neural controller is an intelligent system applied for multi-joint opponent muscle control of a robot finger. Artificial muscles are electric pistons with shape memory alloy (SMA) springs. The neural model proposes functional roles for pre-central cortical cell types in the computation of a descending command to spinal alpha and gamma motor neurons, and allows controlling desired joint movement trajectories by smoothly interpolating between initial and final muscle length commands for the antagonist muscles involved in the movement. Through experimental results, we showed that the neural controller exhibits key kinematic properties of human joint movements, dynamics compensation and including asymmetric bell-shaped velocity profiles. The neural controller allows varying the balance of static and dynamic feedback information to guide the joints’ movement command and to compensate external forces.


Shape Memory Alloy Joint Movement Antagonist Muscle Trajectory Generator Neural Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wu, C.H., Hwang, K.S., Chang, S.L.: Analysis and implementation of a neuromuscular-like control for robotic compliance. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 5, 586–597 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    He, J., Maltenfort, M.G., Wang, Q., Hamm, T.M.: Learning from biological systems: Modeling neural control. IEEE Control systems Magazine, 55–69 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lan, N., Li, Y., Sun, Y., Yang, F.S.: Reflex regulation of antagonist muscles for control of joint equilibrium position. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation engineering 13, 60–71 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacobsen, S.C., Wood, J.E., Knutti, D.F., Biggers, K.B.: The Utah/MIT dextrous hand: Work in progress. The International Journal of Robotics Research 3, 21–50 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott, S.H., Kalaska, J.F.: Changes in motor cortex activity during reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm postures. Journal of Neurophysiology 73, 2563–2567 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riehle, A., Mackay, W.A., Requin, J.: Are extent and force independent movement parameters? Preparation-and movement-related neuronal activity in the monkey cortex. Experimental Brain Research 99, 56–74 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bullock, D., Cisek, P., Grossberg, S.: Cortical networks for control voluntary arm movements under variable force conditions. Cerebral Cortex 8, 48–62 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gorbet, R.B., Wang, D.W.L.: A dissipativity approach to stability of a shape memory alloy position control system. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 6, 554–562 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Madill, D.R., Wang, D.: Modeling and L2-stability of a shape memory alloy position control system. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 6, 473–481 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bullock, D., Grossberg, S.: VITE and FLETE: Neural modules for trajectory formation and tension control. In: Hershberger, W.A. (ed.) Volitional Action, pp. 253–297. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalaska, J.F., Cohen, D.A.D., Hyde, M.L., Prud’homme, M.: A comparison of movement direction- related versus load direction-related activity in primate motor cortex, using a two-dimensional reaching task. Journal of Neuroscience 9, 2080–2102 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Contreras-Vidal, J.L., Grossberg, S., Bullock, D.: Neural model of cerebellar learning for arm movement control: Cortico-spino-cerebellar dynamics. Learn Memory 3, 475–502 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spoelstra, J., Schweighofer, N., Arbib, M.A.: Cerebellar learning of accurate predictive control for fast-reaching movements. Biological Cybernetics 82, 321–333 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco García-Córdova
    • 1
  • Juan Ignacio Mulero-Martínez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systems Engineering and AutomationPolytechnic University of CartagenaCartagena, MurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations