Extending Greenstone for Institutional Repositories
We examine the problem of designing a generalized system for building institutional repositories. Widely used schemes such as DSpace are tailored to a particular set of requirements: fixed metadata set; standard view when searching and browsing; pre-determined sequence for depositing items; built-in workflow for vetting new items. In contrast, Fedora builds in flexibility: institutional repositories are just one possible instantiation—however generality incurs a high overhead and uptake has been sluggish. This paper shows how existing components of the Greenstone software can be repurposed to provide a generalized institutional repository that falls between these extremes.
KeywordsDigital Library Institutional Repository Submission Process Open Archival Information System Full Text Indexing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Fez (accessed June 30, 2006), http://sourceforge.net/projects/fez
- 4.Witten, I.H., Bainbridge, D.: How to build a digital library. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.Witten, I.H., Bainbridge, D., Boddie, S.J.: Power to the people: end-user building of digital library collections. In: Proc. Joint Conf Digital Libraries, pp. 94–103 (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Lucene: Apache Lucene (accessed June 30, 2006), http://lucene.apache.org/
- 7.Crane, D., Pascarello, E., James, D.: Ajax in Action. Manning (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Eprints (accessed June 30, 2006), http://www.eprints.org/
- 9.Nixon, W.: DAEDALUS: Initial experiences with EPrints and DSpace at the Univ. of Glasgow. Ariadne 37 (October 2003) (accessed June 30, 2006), http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/nixon/