Advertisement

A Process and Tool for the Conversion of MARC Records to a Normalized FRBR Implementation

  • Trond Aalberg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4312)

Abstract

This paper presents a generic process and a tool for the conversion of MARC-based bibliographic records to the ER-based model of the Function Requirements for Bibliographic Records. The interpretation of a record, the construction of a new set of records and the final normalization needed, is decomposed into a series of steps that is implemented in the tool using XSL transformations. The purpose of the tool is to support researchers and developers who want to explore FRBR or develop solutions for using FRBR with existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues.

Keywords

Graphic Database Corporate Body Relator Code Bibliographic Record Conversion Tool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ayres, M.-L.: Case studies in implementing Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records [FRBR]: AustLit and MusicAustralia. ALJ: the Australian Library Journal 54(1), 43–54 (2005), http://www.nla.gov.au/nla/staffpaper/2005/ayres1.html Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hegna, K., Murtomaa, E.: Data Mining MARC to Find: FRBR? BIBSYS/HUL (2002), http://folk.uio.no/knuthe/dok/frbr/datamining.pdf
  3. 3.
    Hickey, T.B., O’Neill, E.T., Toves, J.: Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). D-Lib Magazine 8(9) (September 2002), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september02/hickey/09hickey.html
  4. 4.
    International Organization for Standardization TC46/SC4. Information and Documentation: MarcXchange. Draft standard ISO/CD 25577, ISO (2005), http://www.bs.dk/marcxchange/
  5. 5.
    Mönch, C., Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR. In: Koch, T., Sølvberg, I.T. (eds.) ECDL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2769, pp. 405–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OCLC. Fictionfinder, http://fictionfinder.oclc.org/
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    IFLA Study Group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records. Functional requirements for bibliographic records : final report, vol. 19, UBCIM Publications, New Series. K.G. Saur, Munich (1998), http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf
  9. 9.
    Rajapatirana, B., Missingham, R.: The Australian National Bibliographic Database and the Functional Requirements for the Bibliographic Database (FRBR). ALJ: the Australian Library Journal 54(1), 31–42 (2005), http://www.nla.gov.au/nla/staffpaper/2005/missingham3.html Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Library of Congress’ Network Development and MARC Standards Office. FRBR Display Tool, http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/tool.html
  11. 11.
    The Library of Congress’ Network Development and MARC Standards Office. Functional analysis of the MARC 21 bibliographic and holdings formats, http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis
  12. 12.
    VTLS Inc. Virtua integrated library system, http://www.vtls.com/Products/virtua.shtml

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trond Aalberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology 

Personalised recommendations