Advertisement

Constructing Virtual Sensors Using Probabilistic Reasoning

  • Pablo H. Ibargüengoytia
  • Alberto Reyes
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4293)

Abstract

Modern control systems and other monitoring systems require the acquisition of values of most of the parameters involved in the process. Examples of processes are industrial procedures or medical treatments or financial forecasts. However, sometimes some parameters are inaccessible through the use of traditional instrumentation. One example is the blades temperature in a gas turbine during operation. Other parameters require costly instrumentation difficult to install, operate and calibrate. For example, the contaminant emissions of power plant chimney. One solution of this problem is the use of analytical estimation of the parameter using complex differential equations. However, these models sometimes are very difficult to obtain and to maintain according the changes in the processes. Other solution is to borrow an instrument and measure a data set with the value of the difficult variable and its related variables at all the operation range. Then, use an automatic learning algorithm that allows inferring the difficult measure, given the related variables. This paper presents the use of Bayesian networks that represents the probabilistic relations of all the variables in a process, in the design of a virtual sensor. Experiments are presented with the temperature sensors of a gas turbine.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Probabilistic Reasoning Virtual Sensor Markov Blanket Inlet Guide Vane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, S.K., Olesen, K.G., Jensen, F.V., Jensen, F.: Hugin – a shell for building bayesian belief universes for expert systems. In: Proc. Eleventh Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, Detroit, Michigan, USA, August 20-25, 1989, pp. 1080–1085 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dorsey, A.W., Lee, J.H.: Building inferential prediction models of batch processing using subspace identification. J. Proc. Control 13, 397–406 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hanai, et al.: Analysis of initial conditions for polymerization reaction using fuzzy neural network and genetic algorith. Com. Chem. Eng. 27, 1011–1019 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pearl, J.: Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aplein Ingenieros, S.A.: Medida en línea de viscosidad en blending de fuel oil. Technical report, Aplein Ingenieros S.A. (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steck, H., Hofmann, R., Tresp, V.: Concept for the pronel learning algorithm. Technical report, Siemens AG, Munich (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo H. Ibargüengoytia
    • 1
  • Alberto Reyes
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones EléctricasCuernavaca, Mor.México

Personalised recommendations