Advertisement

Applying NEMO to a Mountain Rescue Domain

  • Ben McCarthy
  • Christopher Edwards
  • Martin Dunmore
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3961)

Abstract

In an effort to provide a solution to the problem of internetworking mountain rescue workers without the use of a fixed infrastructure, our group has explored the use of a network model based on the concept of Network Mobility and the use of the NEMO Basic Support Protocol. In this paper we consider the feasibility of this approach through the design, configuration and testing of a working example of this scenario using an implementation of the NEMO Basic Support Protocol made available to us by Cisco Systems (running on their 3200 Series Mobile Access Router platform). We provide the results from performance testing carried out over our testbed that highlights the real impact of the scalability problems of the NEMO Basic Support Protocol in a scenario which results in a nested NEMO topology. In addition we present results that illustrate the performance improvements achievable in our scenario through using the NEMO Route Optimisation (RO) solution, Reverse Routing Header (RRH).

Keywords

Mobility Model Home Agent Correspondent Node Optimize Link State Route Team Mobility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    IEEE 802.11 Working Group Homepage, http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/
  2. 2.
    IEEE 802.16 Task Group e Homepage, http://www.ieee802.org/16/tge/
  3. 3.
    Wimax/802.16 Technological Overview, http://www.wimaxforum.org/technology
  4. 4.
    Thubert, P., et al.: NEMO Basic Support Protocol. IETF RFC 2693 (January 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molteni, M., Thubert, P.: IPv6 Reverse Routing Header and its application to Mobile Networks. IETF Draft (Work In Progress) (June 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cisco 3200 Series Mobile Access Router Homepage, http://www.cisco.com/go/3200
  7. 7.
    Lancaster University Computing Department Website, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/
  8. 8.
    Lancaster University Network Mobility Website, http://www.network-mobility.org/
  9. 9.
    Ng, C., Thubert, P., Watari, M., Zhao, F.: Network Mobility Route Optimization Problem Statement. NEMO Working Group IETF Draft (Work In Progress) (October 2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Das, S., Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E.: Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. IETF Request For Comments 3561 (July 2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacquet, P., Clausen, T.: Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR). IETF Request For Comments 3626 (October 2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben McCarthy
    • 1
  • Christopher Edwards
    • 1
  • Martin Dunmore
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing Department, Infolab 21Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations