Advertisement

On the Cost of Agent-Awareness for Negotiation Services

  • Andrea Giovannucci
  • Juan A. Rodríguez-Aguilar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3529)

Abstract

Significant advances in the development of agent technology have spurred the development of agent-oriented information systems (AOIS). Nonetheless, accounts on the benefits and shortcomings of state-of-the-art agent technology when employed for the deployment of AOIS for electronic commerce are scant. The purpose of this work is to report on a case study that attempts to shedd some light on this matter.

Keywords

Multiagent System Mixed Integer Programming Autonomous Agent Agent Technology Interaction Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Giovanucci, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Reyes-Moro, A., Noria, F.X., Cerquides, J.: Towards automated procurement via agent-aware negotiation support. In: Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, New York, pp. 244–251 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reyes-Moro, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., López-Sánchez, M., Cerquides, J., Gutiérrez-Magallanes, D.: Embedding decision support in e-sourcing tools: Quotes, a case study. Group Decision and Negotiation 12, 347–355 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brazier, F., van Steen, M., Wijngaards, N.: On MAS scalability. In: Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Infrastructure for Agents, MAS, and Scalable MAS, Montreal, pp. 121–126 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deters, R.: Scalability & multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Infrastructure for Agents, MAS, and Scalable MAS, Montreal (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kahn, M.L., Della Torre Cicalese, C.: COABS grid scalability experiments. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7, 171–178 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klein, M., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A., Dellarocas, C.: Using domain-independent exception handling services to enable robust open multi-agent systems: The case of agent death. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7, 179–189 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fedoruk, A., Deters, R.: Improving fault-tolerance by replicating agents. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 737–744. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoo, M.J.: An industrial application of agents for dynamic planning and scheduling. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 264–271. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jarrar, M., Meersman, R.: Scalability and knowledge reusability in ontology modeling. In: Proceedings of the International conference on Infrastructure for e-Business, e-Education, e-Science, and e-Medicine, Volume SSGRR 2002s, Rome, SSGRR education center, (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wache, H., Serafini, L., García-Castro, R.: D2.1.1 survey of scalability techniques for reasoning with ontologies. Technical report, Knowledge Web (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    OMG: FIPA: OMG and FIPA standardisation for agent technology: competition or convergence? (1999), http://www.cordis.lu/infowin/acts/analysys/products/thematic/agents/ch2/ch2.htm
  12. 12.
    Sandholm, T., Suri, S., Gilpin, A., Levine, D.: Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations. In: First Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, pp. 69–76 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hillier, F.S., Liberman, G.J.: Introduction to Operations Research, pp. 576–653. Mc Graw Hill (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Odell, J., van Dyke Parunak, H., Bauer, B.: Extending UML for agents. In: Proceedings of the Agent-Oriented Information Systems Workshop, Austin, TX, 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 3–17 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    FIPA: FIPA interaction protocol library specification. Technical Report DC00025F, Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Giovannucci
    • 1
  • Juan A. Rodríguez-Aguilar
    • 1
  1. 1.Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, IIIASpanish Council for Scientific Research, CSICBellaterra, BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations