Teaching Computing in Secondary Schools in a Dynamic World: Challenges and Directions

  • Bruria Haberman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4226)


The field of computing is relatively young compared with other mature sciences, but it has been rapidly developing since its recognition as a stand-alone discipline. The dynamics of the field has led to its inadequate external image and posed challenges in educating newcomers. As a result, educators have been deliberating how to portray the field to others in a compelling way, and how to make computer science studies more appealing to prospective students. One main challenge for educators is to bridge the gap between school and the "real world" of computing. In this paper I discuss two major aspects of the existing gap that relate to (a) the perception of what computing is about, and (b) the educational milieu. I conclude with a description of computing programs, especially designed for high school, which have been in operation in Israel. The aim of the programs is to expose young students to scientific knowledge and the fundamentals of computing, and to motivate them to achieve expertise in this field.


Computer Science Prospective Teacher Core Technology Mature Science Prospective Student 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ACM/IEEE Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, Software Engineering 2004 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering, A Volume of the Computing Curricula Series (August 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Ministry of Education, Israel, A high-school Software Engineering program (in Hebrew) (2004) (retrieved June 11, 2006), from: http://csit.org.il
  3. 3.
    Ben-Ari, M.: Constructivism in computer science education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 20(1), 45–73 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Ari, M.: Situated Learning in This High-Technology World. In: 7th International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, Winnipeg, Canada (2003); Journal edition published in Science & Education, 14(3-4), 367–376 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ben-Ari, M.: Situated Learning in Computer Science Education. Computer Science Education 14(2), 85–100 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben-Ari, M.: The Concorde Doesn’t Fly Anymore, Keynote Talk. In: SIGCSE 2005, St. Louis, MO (2005) (retrieved March 28, 2006), from: http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-CS/BENARI/files/concorde.pdf
  7. 7.
    Bergin, Fourteen pedagogical patterns for teaching computer science (retrieved March 25, 2006), from: http://csis.pace.edu/~bergin/PedPat1.3.html
  8. 8.
    Denning, P.J., Comer, D.E., Gries, D., Mulder, M.C., Tucker, A., Turner, A.J., Young, P.R.: Computing as a discipline, Communication of the ACM 32(1), 9–23 (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Denning, P.J.: Great principles in computing curricula. In: Proceedings of SIGCSE 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, pp. 336–341 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Denning, P.J., McGettrick, A.: Recentering computer science. Communication of the ACM 48(11), 15–19 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Denning, P.J., McGettrick, A., Rosenbloom, P., Snyder, L.: Re-centering computer science. In: Proceedings of SIGCSE 2006, Norfolk, Virginia, USA (2006) (Special Session)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    du Boulay, B., O’Shea, T., Monk, J.: The black box inside the glass box: Presenting computing concepts to novices. In: Soloway, E., Spohrer, J.C. (eds.) Studying the Novice Programmer, pp. 431–446. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1989)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gal-Ezer, J., Beeri, C., Harel, D., Yehudai, A.: A high-school program in computer science. Computer 28(10), 73–80 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gal-Ezer, J., Harel, D.: What (else) should CS educators know? Communications of the ACM 41(9), 77–84 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gal-Ezer, J., Harel, D.: Curriculum and course syllabi for high school CS program. Computer Science Education 9(2), 114–147 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grandell, L., Peltomaki, M., Back, R.J., Salakoski, T.: Why complicate things? Introducing programming in high school using Python. In: Proceedings of ACE 2006, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia (2006) (retrieved March 25, 2006), from: http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV52Grandell.pdf
  17. 17.
    Guzdial, M., Soloway, E.: Computer science is more important than calculus: The challenge of living up to our potential. Inroads – SIGCSE Bulletin 35(2), 5–8 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haberman, B., Ben-David Kollikant, Y.: Activating “black boxes” instead of opening “zippers” – A method of teaching novices basic CS concepts. Inroads –SIGCSE Bulletin 33(3), 41–44 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Helfman, J., Eylon, B.: Systematic Inventive Thinking, Department of Science Teaching, Weizmann Institute of Science (in Hebrew), Rehovot, Israel, p. 250 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kavander, T., Salakoski, T.: Where have all the flowers gone? – Computer science education in General upper secondary schools. In: Proceedings of the Kolin Kolistelut-Koli Calling Conference, Koli, Finland, pp. 112–115 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lapidot, T., Hazzan, O.: Methods of Teaching Computer Science course for prospective teachers. Inroads – SIGCSE Bulletin 35(4), 29–34 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, P.: The computer science brain drain: A call to revitalize computer science education (2004) (retrieved April 23, 2004), from: https://www.wiki.cs.cmu.edu/public/uploads/Main/it-talent.pdf
  23. 23.
    Long, P.D., Ehrmann, S.C.: Future of the learning space: Breaking out of the box. Educause, 42–58 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papert, S., Harel, I.: Costructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Greenwich (1991)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poirot, J.L., Taylor, H.G., Norris, C.A.: Retraining teachers to teach high school computer science. Communication of the ACM, 912–917 (1988)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts, E.: The dream of a common language: the search for simplicity and stability in computer science education. In: Proceedings of SIGCSE 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, pp. 115–119 (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schollmeyer, M.: Computer programming in high school vs college. In: Proceedings of SIGCSE 1996, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 378–382 (1996)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stephenson, C., Gal-Ezer, J., Haberman, B., Verno, A.: The new educational imperative: Improving high school computer science education. Final report of the CSTA Curriculum Improvement Task Force (February 2005) (retrieved June 11, 2006), from: http://csta.acm.org/Publications/CSTA-WhitePaperNC.pdf
  29. 29.
    Stevenson, D.E.: Science, computational science and computer science: At a crossroads. In: Proceedings of the 1993 ACM conference on Computer Science, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, pp. 7–14 (1993)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yehezkel, C., Haberman, B.: Bridging the gap between school computing and the “real world”. In: Mittermeir, R.T. (ed.) ISSEP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4226, pp. 39–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruria Haberman
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science Dept.Holon Institute of Technology, and, Davidson Institute of Science Education, Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations