Theoretical informatics is a hard component of future teachers of informatics academic training. Relatively small space is allocated to it and thus the students’ learning curve is very short and very steep. We assume this happens because we expose our students to fundamental problems before they come across them by themselves. We tend to provide students with formal analysis of unfamiliar topics using unfamiliar language.

To improve this we decided to build a new seminar, in which a series of interactive environments developed in Imagine Logo are being used. Using them, students discover fundamentals of informatics. Through such tangible experience they construct their own knowledge and discuss many key challenges with us.

We continue iterative improvement of the contents and form of the seminar. Using methods of the action research we want to understand the problem and help our students to be familiar with the language of theoretical informatics and build positive attitude towards the informatics fundamentals. As an indirect effect we have noticed their growing interest in new forms of teaching/learning methods and growing expectations for the quality of educational software.


Boolean Function Interactive Interface Logic Circuit Future Teacher Educational Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blaho, A., Kalas, I.: Object Metaphor Helps Create Simple Logo Projects. In: Proc. of EuroLogo 2001, A Turtle Odyssey, Linz, pp. 55–65 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education. Routledge Falmer, London (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edwards, L.D.: Microworlds as representations. In: di Sessa, A.A., Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Edwards, L.D. (eds.) Computers and exploratory learning, pp. 127–154. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feurzeig, W., Richards, J.: Function Machines. CACM, 39(8), 88–90 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalas, I., Blaho, A.: Imagine New Generation of Logo: Programmable Pictures. In: Proc. of WCC 2000, Educational Uses of ICT, Beijing, pp. 427–430 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalas, I., Blaho, A.: Exploring visible mathematics with Imagine. In: Marshall, G., Katz, Y. (eds.) Learning in School, Home and Community, pp. 53–64. IFIP Kluwer (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lehotska, D., Kalas, I.: Proc of the 7th Int. Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching, vol. 1, pp. 108–116. University of Bristol, Bristol (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehotska, D.: Visual Fractions in Teacher Training. In: The IFIP TC3 WG3.1, 3.3 and 3.5 Joint Conference in Alesund (2006) (accepted paper)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prusinkiewicz, P., Lindenmayer, A.: The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer, New York (1996)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Resnick, M.: Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age. In: Kirkman, G. (ed.) The Global Information Technology Report: Readiness for the Networked World, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rieber, L.P.: Microworlds. In: Jonassen, D. (ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 2nd edn., pp. 583–603. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Kalas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics Education, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and InformaticsComenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations