Exploring Modelling Strategies in a Meta-modelling Context

  • P. van Bommel
  • S. J. B. A. Hoppenbrouwers
  • H. A. (Erik) Proper
  • T. P. van der Weide
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4278)


We are concerned with a core aspect of the processes of obtaining conceptual models. We view such processes as information gathering dialogues, in which strategies may be followed (possibly, imposed) in order to achieve certain modelling goals. Many goals and strategies for modelling can be distinguished, but the current discussion concerns meta-model driven strategies, aiming to fulfil modelling goals or obligations that are the direct result of meta-model choices (i.e. the chosen modelling language). We provide a rule-based conceptual framework for capturing strategies for modelling, and give examples based on a simplified version of the Object Role Modelling (ORM) meta-model. We discuss strategy rules directly related to the meta-model, and additional procedural rules. We indicate how the strategies may be used to dynamically set a modelling agenda. Finally, we describe a generic conceptual structure for a strategy catalog.


Modelling Language Modelling Strategy Modelling Agenda Modelling Goal Fact Type 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anthony, S., Batra, D., Santhanam, R.: The use of a knowledge–based system in conceptual data modeling. Decision Support Systems 41, 176–190 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakema, G.P., Zwart, J.P.C., van der Lek, H.: Fully Communication Oriented NIAM. In: Proceedings of NIAM–ISDM 2, August 1994, pp. 1–35 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batra, D., Antony, S.: Consulting support during conceptual database design in the presence of redundancy in requirements specifications: an empirical study. IBM Journal of Research and Development 54, 25–51 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frederiks, P.J.M., van der Weide, T.P.: Information Modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data & Knowledge Engineering (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halpin, T.A.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases, From Conceptual Analysis to Logical Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A(E.), van der Weide, T.P.: A Fundamental View on the Process of Conceptual Modeling. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 128–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A.(E.), van der Weide, T.P.: Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation. In: Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Haraldson, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2005), Linköpings Universitet and Hogskolan I Boras, Sweden, EU, June 2005, pp. 139–155 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A(E.), van der Weide, T.P.: Understanding the Requirements on Modelling Techniques. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nijssen, G.M.: Universele Informatiekunde. PNA Publishing, The Netherlands (1993) (in Dutch) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Proper, H.A(E.), Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., van der Weide, T.P.: A Fact–Oriented Approach to Activity Modeling. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 666–675. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. van Bommel
    • 1
  • S. J. B. A. Hoppenbrouwers
    • 1
  • H. A. (Erik) Proper
    • 1
  • T. P. van der Weide
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Computing and Information SciencesRadboud University NijmegenED NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations