Advertisement

A Proposal for a Gene Functions Wiki

  • Robert Hoehndorf
  • Kay Prüfer
  • Michael Backhaus
  • Heinrich Herre
  • Janet Kelso
  • Frank Loebe
  • Johann Visagie
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4277)

Abstract

Large knowledge bases integrating different domains can provide a foundation for new applications in biology such as data mining or automated reasoning. The traditional approach to the construction of such knowledge bases is manual and therefore extremely time consuming. The ubiquity of the internet now makes large-scale community collaboration for the construction of knowledge bases, such as the successful online encyclopedia “Wikipedia”, possible.

We propose an extension of this model to the collaborative annotation of molecular data. We argue that a semantic wiki provides the functionality required for this project since this can capitalize on the existing representations in biological ontologies. We discuss the use of a different relationship model than the one provided by RDF and OWL to represent the semantic data. We argue that this leads to a more intuitive and correct way to enter semantic content in the wiki. Furthermore, we show how formal ontologies could be used to increase the usability of the software through type-checking and automatic reasoning.

Keywords

Gene Ontology Semantic Relation Semantic Content Description Logic Biomedical Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chicurel, M.: Bioinformatics: bringing it all together. Nature 419(6908), 751–755 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birney, E., et al.: Ensembl 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(Database issue), 556–561 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wheeler, D.L., et al.: Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(Database issue), 173–180 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Gene Ontology Consortium: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25(1), 25–29 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, K.: Gene-function wiki would let biologists pool worldwide resources. Nature 439(7076), 534 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Internet Community: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2006), http://wikipedia.org
  7. 7.
    Giles, J.: Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 900–901 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Auer, S.: Powl – a web based platform for collaborative semantic web development. In: Proc. of 1st Workshop Workshop Scripting for the Semantic Web (SFSW 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer, J., Gantner, Z., Rendle, S., Stritt, M., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Semantic wiki COW (2006), http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/cgnm/software/cow/index_en.html
  10. 10.
    Völkel, M., Krötzsch, M., Vrandecic, D., Haller, H., Studer, R.: Semantic wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 585–594 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris, D., Harris, N.: Kendra base (2006), http://base.kendra.org.uk/
  12. 12.
    Dello, K., Tolksdorf, R., Paslaru, E.: Makna (2006), http://www.apps.ag-nbi.de/makna/
  13. 13.
    Campanini, S.E., Castagna, P., Tazzoli, R.: Platypus wiki: a semantic wiki wiki web. In: Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives, Proceedings of 1st Italian Semantic Web Workshop (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bard, J., Rhee, S.Y., Ashburner, M.: An ontology for cell types. Genome Biol. 6(2), R21 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burek, P., Hoehndorf, R., Loebe, F., Visagie, J., Herre, H., Kelso, J.: A top-level ontology of functions and its application in the Open Biomedical Ontologies. Bioinformatics 22(14), e66–e73 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burek, P.: Ontology of Functions. PhD thesis, Institute of Informatics (IfI), University of Leipzig (forthcoming, 2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoehndorf, R., Prüfer, K., Backhaus, M., Visagie, J., Kelso, J.: The design of a wiki-based curation system for the ontology of functions. In: The Joint BioLINK and 9th Bio-Ontologies Meeting (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfyability. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 17–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Devlin, K.: Logic and Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Group, O.M.: UML 2.0 infrastructure specification. Document ptc/03-09-15 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pepper, S., Moore, G.: XML topic maps (XTM) 1.0 (2001), http://topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/
  22. 22.
    Garshol, L.M., Moore, G.: Topic maps – XML syntax (2006), http://www.isotopicmaps.org/sam/sam-xtm/
  23. 23.
    Loebe, F.: An analysis of roles: Towards ontology-based modelling. Master’s thesis, Institute of Informatics (IfI), University of Leipzig (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loebe, F.: Abstract vs. social roles: A refined top-level ontological analysis. In: Boella, G., Odell, J., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2005 AAAI Fall Symposium Roles, an Interdisciplinary Perspective: Ontologies, Languages, and Multiagent Systems. Number FS-05-08 in Fall Symposium Series Technical Reports, Arlington, Virginia, November 3-6, pp. 93–100. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rector, A., Stevens, R., Rogers, J.: Simple bio upper ontology (2006), http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~rector/ontologies/simple-top-bio/
  26. 26.
    Loebe, F., Hoehndorf, R.: General Formal Ontology (2006), https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/gfo/
  27. 27.
    Vrandecic, D., Krötzsch, M.: Reusing ontological background knowledge in semantic wikis. In: Völkel, M., Schaffert, S., Decker, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Workshop on Semantic Wikis – From Wikis to Semantics (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herre, H., Heller, B., Burek, P., Hoehndorf, R., Loebe, F., Michalek, H.: General Formal Ontology (GFO) – a foundational ontology integrating objects and processes. Onto-Med Report 8, University of Leipzig (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Masolo, C., Guizzardi, G., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Ferrario, R.: Relational roles and qua-individuals. In: Boella, G., Odell, J., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2005 AAAI Fall Symposium Roles, an Interdisciplinary Perspective: Ontologies, Languages, and Multiagent Systems. Number FS-05-08 in Fall Symposium Series Technical Reports, Arlington, Virginia, November 3-6, pp. 103–112. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1998, 15th Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Madison, US (1998)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wikipedia: Web of trust — wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2006) [Online; accessed August 19, 2006]Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wikipedia: Wikipedia: neutral point of view — wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2006) [Online; accessed August 19, 2006]Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Good, B.M., Tranfield, E., Tan, P., Shehata, M., Singhera, G., Gosselink, J., Okon, E., Wilkinson, M.: Fast, cheap and out of control: a zero curation model for ontology development. In: Proceedings of the PSB 2006 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Hoehndorf
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kay Prüfer
    • 2
  • Michael Backhaus
    • 1
    • 2
  • Heinrich Herre
    • 1
    • 3
  • Janet Kelso
    • 2
  • Frank Loebe
    • 1
    • 3
  • Johann Visagie
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Group Ontologies in Medicine, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of Leipzig 
  2. 2.Department of Evolutionary GeneticsMax-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology 
  3. 3.Institute for InformaticsUniversity of Leipzig 

Personalised recommendations