More Than Wires, Pipes and Ducts: Some Lessons from Grassroots Networked Communities and Master-Planned Neighbourhoods

  • Mark Gaved
  • Marcus Foth
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4277)

Abstract

Community informatics research has found that the provision of technical connectivity in local neighbourhoods alone does not ensure community interaction. Externally initiated projects applied to communities by government or commercial bodies have encountered difficulties where the project’s goals do not correspond to the host community’s. Differing expectations can lead to disillusionment or rejection. Self-organised initiatives developed from within communities appear to be more aligned with residents’ goals and purposes and may not face these issues. However, such initiatives have also encountered difficulties in maintaining volunteer input and achieving technological sustainability. Valuable insights can be drawn from both cases. In this paper we review examples of each type of initiative and consider lessons that can be taken forward into new networked neighbourhood initiatives currently being developed. We consider one specific example, an inner-city master-planned residential development in Australia seeking to establish a community association to support socio-economic sustainability and governance of the local ICT infrastructure. We offer recommendations drawn from existing projects that may be applied to this site and to a wider context, and consider some implications for the future selection, deployment and maintenance of community information systems.

Keywords

community informatics community information systems community networks grassroots communities networked communities master-planned communities urban neighbourhoods ICT 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, M., Gibbs, M.R., Wright, P.: Intranets and Local Community: Yes, an intranet is all very well, but do we still get free beer and a barbeque? In: Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T), Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  2. Buys, L., Barnett, K., Miller, E., Bailey, C.: Smart Housing and Social Sustainability: Learning from the Residents of Queensland’s Research House. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 3(1), 43–45 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. Cohill, A.M., Kavanaugh, A.L. (eds.): Community Networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, 2nd edn., Virginia. Artech House, Norwood (2000)Google Scholar
  4. Davies, W.: Proxicommunication: ICT and the local public realm. The Work Foundation, London (2004)Google Scholar
  5. Day, P., Cupidi, R.: Building and Sustaining Healthy Communities: The symbiosis between community technology and community research. In: Paper presented at the Community Informatics Research Network (CIRN) Conference, Prato, Italy, Sep 29 – Oct 1 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. DCITA, The role of ICT in building communities and social capital: a discussion paper. Canberra, ACT: Dep. of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Devins, D., Darlow, A., Petrie, A., Burden, T.: Connecting communities to the Internet: evaluation of the Wired Up Communities programme (DFES report No. RR389). Leeds: Policy Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University (2003)Google Scholar
  8. Farrington, C., Pine, E.: Community memory: A case study in community communication. In: Agre, P., Schuler, D. (eds.) Reinventing technology. Albex, Rediscovering community (1996)Google Scholar
  9. Foth, M.: Analyzing the Factors Influencing the Successful Design and Uptake of Interactive Systems to Support Social Networks in Urban Neighborhoods. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 2(2), 65–79 (2006a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foth, M.: Facilitating Social Networking in Inner-City Neighborhoods. IEEE Computer 39(9) (2006b)Google Scholar
  11. Foth, M.: Network Action Research. Action Research 4(2), 205–226 (2006c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foth, M.: Research to Inform the Design of Social Technology for Master-Planned Communities. In: Paper presented at the 14th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Göteborg, Sweden, June 12-14 (2006d)Google Scholar
  13. Foth, M., Adkins, B.: A Research Design to Build Effective Partnerships between City Planners, Developers, Government and Urban Neighbourhood Communities. Journal of Community Informatics 2(3) (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Foth, M., Hearn, G.: Networked Individualism of Urban Residents: Discovering the Communicative Ecology in Inner-City Apartment Complexes. Information, Communication & Society (forthcoming) (2006) Google Scholar
  15. Gaved, M., Anderson, B.: The impact of local ICT initiatives on social capital and quality of life (No. 2006-6). University of Essex, Colchester (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Gaved, M., Mulholland, P.: Ubiquity from the bottom up: grassroots initiated networked communities. In: Consalvo, M., O’Riordan, K. (eds.) AoIR Internet Research Annual, vol. 3. Peter Lang, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  17. Gilchrist, A.: The well-connected community: networking to the edge of chaos. Community Development Journal 35(3), 264–275 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gleeson, B.: Deprogramming Planning: Collaboration and Inclusion in New Urban Development. Urban Policy and Research 22(3), 315–322 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gleeson, B., Darbas, T., Lawson, S.: Governance, Sustainability and Recent Australian Metropolitan Strategies: A Socio-theoretic Analysis. Urban Policy and Research 22(4), 345–366 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gurstein, M.: Effective use: a community informatics strategy beyond the digital divide. First Monday 8(12) (2003)Google Scholar
  21. Hampton, K.: Grieving for a lost network: collective action in a wired suburb. The Information Society 19(5), 417–428 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hampton, K., Wellman, B.: Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb. City and Community 2(4), 277–311 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Healy, E., Birrell, B.: Housing and Community in the Compact City (Positioning Paper), Melbourne. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, VIC (2004)Google Scholar
  24. Hearn, G., Mandeville, T.D., Anthony, D.: The communication superhighway: social and economic change in the digital age. Allen & Unwin, Sydney (1998)Google Scholar
  25. Hopkins, L.: Making a Community Network Sustainable: The Future of the Wired High Rise. The Information Society 25(5), 379–384 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jankowski, N.W.: Creating Community with Media: History, Theories and Scientific Investigations. In: Lievrouw, L.A., Livingstone, S. (eds.) Handbook of New Media, 2nd edn., Sage, London (2006)Google Scholar
  27. McQuillan, H.: Ennis Information Age Town: A Connected Community. Eircomm, Ennis (2000)Google Scholar
  28. Pinkett, R.D.: Community technology and community building: early results from the Creating Community Connections project. The Information Society 19(5), 365–379 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Queensland Government, Smart Queensland: Smart State Strategy 2005–2015, Brisbane. Department of the Premier and Cabinet, QLD (2005)Google Scholar
  30. Randolph, B.: The Changing Australian City: New Patterns, New Policies and New Research Needs. Urban Policy and Research 22(4), 481–493 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schuler, D.: New Community Networks: Wired for Change. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  32. Selwyn, N.: Apart from technology: understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society 25(1), 99–116 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skyva, R.: The Hulme job: Redbricks Online Community Network. Unpublished MSc thesis, Salford University, Salford (2002)Google Scholar
  34. Warschauer, M.: Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday 7(7) (2002)Google Scholar
  35. Wellman, B.: Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2), 227–252 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Gaved
    • 1
  • Marcus Foth
    • 2
  1. 1.Knowledge Media InstituteThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Institute for Creative Industries and InnovationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations