Advertisement

Natural MDA: Controlled Natural Language for Action Specifications on Model Driven Development

  • Luciana N. Leal
  • Paulo F. Pires
  • Maria Luiza M. Campos
  • Flávia C. Delicato
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4275)

Abstract

Current technologies are continuously evolving and software companies need to adapt their processes to these changes. Such adaptation often requires new investments in training and development. To address this issue, OMG defined a model driven development approach (MDD) which insulates business and application logic from technology evolution. Current MDD approaches falls short in fully derive implementation from models described at a high abstraction level. We propose a controlled natural language to complement UML models as an action specification language. In this article, we describe the language, its impact on systems development and the tools developed to support it. In order to demonstrate the language usability we present an application example.

Keywords

Unify Modeling Language Object Constraint Language Action Semantic Unify Modeling Language Model High Abstraction Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, J.: Natural Language Understanding. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc. (1995) ISBN:0-8053-0334-0Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AndroMDA: AndroMDA: Getting started (2004), http://www.andromda.org
  3. 3.
    ANTLR: Another Tool for Language Recognition (2004), http://www.antlr.org/
  4. 4.
    BridgePoint. Object Action Language (2005) , http://www.acceleratedtechnology.com
  5. 5.
    Brown, A.W., Conallen, J.: An introduction to model-driven architecture – How MDA affects the iterative development process(2005), http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/may05/brown
  6. 6.
    Bryant, B., Lee, B.S.: Two-Level Grammar as an Object-Oriented Requirements Specification Language. In: XXXV Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 9, p. 280. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002) ISBN:0-7695-1435-9Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cianni, N.M., Cabeço, T.: Editor for Action Specifications in Controlled Natural Language (2006), http://dataware.nce.ufrj.br:8080/dataware_en
  8. 8.
    Damn, W., Harel, D.: LSCs: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts. Formal Methods in System Design 19, 45–80 (2001) ISSN:0925-9856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dinh-Trong, T.: JAL: Java like Action Language, Specification 1.1, Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University (October 2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    EJB: Enterprise Java Beans (2003), http://java.sun.com/products/ejb
  11. 11.
    Fowler, M., Beck, K., Brant, J., Opdyke, W., Roberts, D.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999) ISBN 0201485672Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hibernate: Hibernate (2006), http://www.hibernate.org/
  13. 13.
    Kabira: Kabira Action Semantics (2002), http://www.kabira.com
  14. 14.
    Kleppe, A., Warmer, J.: Extending OCL to include actions. In: International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, pp. 440–450 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leal, L.N., Pires, P.F., Campos, M.L.M.: An Action Specification Language based on Controlled Natural Language. In: Proceedings of XX Brazilian Symposium on Programming Languages, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2006) (in portuguese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leal, L.N.: Natural MDA: An action specification language based on controlled natural language, Ms Thesis, UFRJ, Brazil (2006), http://dataware.nce.ufrj.br:8080/dataware_en/public/thesi/ObservationalStudy
  18. 18.
    Leonardi, M.C., Mauco, M.V.: Integrating Natural Language Oriented Requirements Models into MDA. In: Workshop on Requirements Engineering, Argentina (2004), http://www.sigmod.org/dblp/dp/conf/wer/wer2004.html
  19. 19.
    Linhalis, F., Moreira, D.A.: Execution of Imperative Natural Language Requisitions Based on UNL Interlingua and Software Components. In: International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS) (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McNeile, A., Simons, N.: Methods of behaviour modeling: a commentary on behaviour modeling techniques for MDA (2004), http://wwwmetamaxim.com/download/documents/Methods.pdf
  21. 21.
    Mellor, S.J., et al.: Software-Platform-Independent, Precise Action Specifications for UML. In: Proceeding of UML 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mosses, P.D.: Theory and Practice of Action Semantics, BRICS Report Series. RS-96-53. (December 1996) ISSN 0909-0878Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    OMG, Action Semantics for the UML – Request for Proposal (1999), http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/98-11-01.pdf
  24. 24.
    OMG, Action Semantics Consortium, Action semantics for the UML (2001), http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/2001-03-01
  25. 25.
    Pender, T.: UML Bible. Wiley Publishers, Chichester (2003) ISBN: 0-7645-2604-9Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rational: Rational Unified Process V7.0 Evaluation (2006), http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/downloads/r/rup
  27. 27.
    Selonen, P., Systa, T., Koskimies, K.: Generating Structured Implementation Schemes from UML Sequence Diagrams. In: Proceedings of TOOLS USA, Santa Barbara, California, USA, July-August 2001, pp. 317–328. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silva, S.R.P., Souza, C.S.: The Definition of an End-User Programming Language for Extensible Applications. In: Proceedings of V Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems, Fortaleza, Brazil, vol. 1, pp. 72–83 (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    String Template: String Template (2005), http://www.stringtemplate.org/
  30. 30.
    Ushida, H., Zhu, M.: The Universal Networking Language beyond Machine Translation. In: International Symposium on Language and Cyberspace (September 2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Visual Rules: Visual Rules (2006), http://www.visual-rules.de
  32. 32.
    Visula: The Visula Programming Language (2004), http://visula.org
  33. 33.
    Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language - Getting Your Models Ready for MDA. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003) ISBN: 0-321-17936-6Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilkie, I., et al.: ASL Manual, Kennedy Carter Ltd (2001), http://www.kc.com

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciana N. Leal
    • 1
  • Paulo F. Pires
    • 2
  • Maria Luiza M. Campos
    • 1
  • Flávia C. Delicato
    • 2
  1. 1.DCC – IM/NCEFederal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.DIMApFederal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatalBrazil

Personalised recommendations