Three Case-Studies on Common Software Process Problems in Software Company Acquisitions
In this article three cases of small or medium sized software companies acquiring companies of the same or smaller size are analyzed from the software process point of view. The analysis shows that the problems in those acquisitions are fairly common and the types of those problems are fairly similar in different cases. Although those acquisitions have the potential to satisfy their goals of complementing or improving the product portfolio or the customer base of the companies, the actual success of the acquisitions may not be as good as expected. The main reasons for the relative unsuccessfulness of the analyzed cases seem to be the lack of proper planning for the merger and communication problems which hinder effective and high-quality work in the new post-acquisition organization.
KeywordsSoftware Engineering Product Portfolio Software Process Improvement Common Software Improvement Step
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Järvinen, P.: On Research Methods. Opinpajan Kirja, Tampere (2001)Google Scholar
- 3.Karjalainen, A., Päivärinta, T., Tyrväinen, P., Rajala, J.: Genre-based metadata for enterprise document management. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2000, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 3013–3022. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Ahonen, J.J., Junttila, T.: A case study on quality-affecting problems in software engineering projects. In: Proceedings of 2003 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology & Engineering, SwSTE 2003, pp. 145–153 (2003)Google Scholar
- 7.Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbauch, J.: Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
- 8.Jaaksi, A., Aalto, J.M., Aalto, A., Vättö, K.: Tried & True Object Development: Industry-Proven Approaches with UML. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
- 9.Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
- 10.Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, London (1998)Google Scholar