Skip to main content

Rough Set Approach to Customer Satisfaction Analysis

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4259))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Customer satisfaction analysis has become a hot issue in strategic management. The basis of any decision in this field is the analysis of the answers of a sample of customers to a specific questionnaire. Traditionally, using a methodology called conjoint analysis, the data obtained from the questionnaires are used to build a collective utility function representing customer preferences. This utility function permits to measure the satisfaction of the customers and to determine the most critical features relevant for the appreciation of the considered products or services. In this paper, we propose an alternative methodology to analyze the data from the questionnaire. Our approach is based on the rough set methodology and represents the preferences of the customers by means of simple decision rules such as “if feature α is considered good and feature β is considered sufficient, then the overall evaluation of the product is medium”. The interpretation of the decision rules is simpler and more direct than the interpretation of the utility function given by conjoint analysis. Moreover, the capacity of representing customer preferences in terms of easily understandable “if ..., then...” statements expressed in the natural language makes our approach particularly interesting for Kansei Engineering. The proposed methodology gives also some indications relative to strategic interventions aimed at improving the quality of the offered products and services. The expected efficiency of these interventions is measured, which is very useful for the definition of proper customer satisfaction strategies. Our approach supplies an integrated support to customer satisfaction oriented management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Pappalardo, N., Słowiński, R.: Measuring expected effects of interventions based on decision rules. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 17(1-2), 103–118 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough set theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129, 1–47 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Decision rule approach. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Erghott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 507–563. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R., Stefanowski, J.: Variable Consistency Model of Dominance-Based Rough Sets Approach. In: Ziarko, W.P., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSCTC 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2005, pp. 170–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Słowiński, R.: Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17, 345–361 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Green, P.E., Srinivasan, V.: Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. The Journal of consumer Research 5(2), 103–123 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hilderman, R.J., Hamilton, H.J.: Knowledge Discovery and Measures of Interest. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagamachi, M.: Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 15(1), 3–11 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Rough Set Based Decision Support, ch. 16. In: Burke, E., Kendall, G. (eds.) Introductory Tutorials on Optimization, Search and Decision Support Methodologies, pp. 475–527. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yao, Y.Y., Zhong, N.: An analysis of quantitative measures associated with rules. In: Zhong, N., Zhou, L. (eds.) PAKDD 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1574, pp. 479–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziarko, W.: Variable precision rough sets model. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences 46(1), 39–59 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ziarko, W.: Rough sets as a methodology for data mining. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Sets in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 1, pp. 554–576. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R. (2006). Rough Set Approach to Customer Satisfaction Analysis. In: Greco, S., et al. Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. RSCTC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4259. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11908029_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11908029_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47693-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49842-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics