Advertisement

Voice Quality on the Internet in 2005 as Measured by www.TestYourVoIP.com

  • Mark Sylor
  • Nagarjuna Venna
  • Harrison Ripps
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4269)

Abstract

How well can the Internet serve as a network carrying voice calls? To answer that question, we have been running a web site called TestYourVoIP where users can run tests of VoIP Quality from their PC. In this paper we describe how TestYourVoIP operates, the kinds of tests it performs, and the results we have found from those tests. Our findings indicate that while many users will get acceptable call quality, too many will not. We offer some insights as to the reasons for poor quality based on these real world experiences. Lastly, we note that over 2005, voice quality on the Internet has gotten worse.

Keywords

Mean Opinion Score Voice Quality Late Packet Mean Opinion Score Score Jitter Buffer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    The E Model: A computational model for use in transmission quality, ITU-T Recommendation G.107 (December 1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Telchemy, Inc. Voice Quality Measurement (January 2005), http://www.telchemy.com/appnotes/TelchemyVoiceQualityMeasurement.pdf
  3. 3.
    Ramjee, R., Kurose, J., Towsley, D., Schulzrinne, H.: Adaptive playout mechanisms for packetized audio applications in wide-area networks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom), Toronto, Canada, pp. 680–688 (June 1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markopoulou, A., Tobagi, F., Karam, M.: Assessing the Quality of Voice Communications Over Internet Backbones. IEE/ACM Trans. Networking 11(5) (October 2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Claffy, K.C., Crovella, M., Friedman, T., Shannon, C., Sring, N.: Community-Oriented Network Measurement Infrastructure (CONMI) Workshop Report. ACM SSIGCOMM Comp. Comm. Review 36(2) (April 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CAIDA, the Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis, http://www.caida.org/
  7. 7.
    Simpson Jr., C., Riley, G.: NETI@home: A Distributed Approach to Collecting End-to-End Network Performance Measurements. In: Barakat, C., Pratt, I. (eds.) PAM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3015, pp. 168–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shavitt, Y., Shir, E.: DIMES: A Distributed Architecture for Internet Measurement and Monitoring. In: IEEE Infocom 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang, W., Schulzrinne, H.: Assessment of VoIP Service Availability in the Current Internet. In: PAM 2003 A workshop on Passive and Active Measurements (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keynote’s Hard Numbers On VoIP Quality. VOIP Magazine (July 2005), http://www.voip-magazine.com/content/view/275/

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Sylor
    • 1
  • Nagarjuna Venna
    • 1
  • Harrison Ripps
    • 1
  1. 1.Brix NetworksChelmsford

Personalised recommendations