Power-Aware Processors for Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Gürhan Küçük
  • Can Başaran
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4263)


Today, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) enable us to run a new range of applications from habitat monitoring, to military and medical applications. A typical WSN node is composed of several sensors, a radio communication interface, a microprocessor, and a limited power supply. In many WSN applications, such as forest fire monitoring or intruder detection, user intervention and battery replenishment is not possible. Since the battery lifetime is directly related to the amount of processing and communication involved in these nodes, optimal resource usage becomes a major issue. A typical WSN application may sense and process very close or constant data values for long durations, when the environmental conditions are stable. This is a common behavior that can be exploited to reduce the power consumption of WSN nodes. This study combines two orthogonal techniques to reduce the energy dissipation of the processor component of the sensor nodes. First, we briefly discuss silent-store filtering MoteCache. Second, we utilize Content-Aware Data MAnagement (CADMA) on top of MoteCache architecture to achieve further energy savings and performance improvements. The complexity increase introduced by CADMA is also compensated by further complexity reduction in MoteCache. Our optimal configuration reduces the total node energy, and hence increases the node lifetime, by 19.4% on the average across a wide variety of simulated sensor benchmarks. Our complexity-aware configuration with a minimum MoteCache size achieves not only energy savings up to 16.2% but also performance improvements up to 4.3%, on the average.


Sensor Network Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Energy Saving Register File 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D., Pister, K.: System Architecture Directions for Networked Sensors. In: Proc. of ASPLOS IX, pp. 93–104. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AmbientRT: Real-Time Operating System for embedded devices, http://www.ambient-systems.net/ambient/technology-rtos.htm
  3. 3.
    Conner, W.S., Chhabra, J., Yarvis, M., Krishnamurthy, L.: Experimental Evaluation of Synchronization and Topology Control for In-Building Sensor Network Applications. In: Proc. of WSNA 2003 (September 2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madden, S., Franklin, M.J., Hellerstein, J.M., Hong, W.: TinyDB: An Acquisitional Query Processing System for Sensor Networks. ACM TODS (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polastre, J.R.: Design and Implementation of Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Monitoring. Research Project, University of California, Berkeley (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kucuk, G., Basaran, C.: Reducing Energy Dissipation of Wireless Sensor Processors Using Silent-Store-Filtering MoteCache. In: Vounckx, J., Azémard, N., Maurine, P. (eds.) PATMOS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4148, pp. 256–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crossbow Technology, Inc., http://www.xbow.com
  8. 8.
    Lynch, C., O’Reilly, F.: Processor Choice for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghose, K., Kamble, M.: Reducing Power in Superscalar Processor Caches Using Subbanking, Multiple Line Buffers and Bit-Line Segmentation. In: ISLPED 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kucuk, G., et al.: Energy Efficient Register Renaming. In: Chico, J.J., Macii, E. (eds.) PATMOS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2799, pp. 219–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lepak, K.M., Bell, G.B., Lipasti, M.H.: Silent Stores and Store Value Locality. IEEE Transactions on Computers 11(50) (November 2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Titzer, B., et al.: Avrora: Scalable Sensor Network Simulation with Precise Timing. In: 4th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Levis, P., Culler, D.: Maté: A Tiny Virtual Machine for Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of the ASPLOS X (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baydere, S., Ergin, M.A.: An Architectural Approach to Service Access in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proc. of Wireless and Optical Communications Conference (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ekanayake, V., et al.: An Ultra Low-Power Processor for Sensor Networks. In: Proc. ASPLOS (October 2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hempstead, M., et al.: An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications. In: Proc. of 32nd ISCA 2005, Wisconsin, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Warneke, B.A., Pister, K.S.: An Ultra-Low Energy Microcontroller for Smart Dust Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. ISSCC (January 2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gürhan Küçük
    • 1
  • Can Başaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringYeditepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations