In synthesis we construct finite state systems from temporal specifications. While this problem is well understood in the classical setting of non-probabilistic synthesis, this paper suggests the novel approach of open synthesis under the assumptions of an environment that chooses its actions randomized rather than nondeterministically. Assuming a randomized environment inspires alternative semantics both for linear-time and branching-time logics. For linear-time, natural acceptance criteria are almost-sure and observable acceptance, where it suffices if the probability measure of accepting paths is 1 and greater than 0, respectively.

We distinguish 0-environments, which can freely assign probabilities to each environment action, from ε-environments, where the probabilities assigned by the environment are bound from below by some ε>0. While the results in case of 0-environments are essentially the same as for nondeterministic environments, the languages occurring in case of ε-environments are topologically different from the results for nondeterministic and 0-environments (in case of LTL, recognizable by weak alternating automata vs. recognizable by deterministic automata). The complexity of open synthesis is, in both cases, EXPTIME and 2EXPTIME-complete for CTL and LTL specifications, respectively.


Synthesis Problem Winning Strategy Tree Automaton Classical Semantic Probabilistic Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abadi, M., Lamport, L., Wolper, P.: Realizable and unrealizable concurrent program specifications. In: Ronchi Della Rocca, S., Ausiello, G., Dezani-Ciancaglini, M. (eds.) ICALP 1989. LNCS, vol. 372, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anuchitanukul, A., Manna, Z.: Realizability and synthesis of reactive modules. In: Dill, D.L. (ed.) CAV 1994. LNCS, vol. 818, pp. 156–168. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. In: Proc. IBM Workshop on Logics of Programs, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Courcoubetis, C., Yannakakis, M.: The complexity of probabilistic verification. J. ACM 42(4), 857–907 (1995)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Alfaro, L.: From fairness to chance. In: Proc. PROBMIV 1998 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finkbeiner, B., Schewe, S.: Uniform distributed synthesis. In: Proc. LICS, pp. 321–330. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gurevich, Y., Harrington, L.: Trees, automata and games 14, 60–65 (1982)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hansson, H., Jonsson, B.: A logic for reasoning about time and reliability. Formal Aspects of Computing 6(5), 512–535 (1994)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.: Freedom, weakness, and determinism: From linear-time to branching-time. In: Proc. LICS (June 1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y.: Synthesis with incomplete information. In: Proc. ICTL, Manchester, pp. 91–106 (July 1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y.: Church’s problem revisited. The bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5(2), 245–263 (1999)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y.: Synthesizing distributed systems. In: Proc. LICS 2001, pp. 389–398. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lehmann, D., Rabin, M.O.: On the advantages of free choice: a symmetric and fully distributed solution to the dining philosophers problem. In: Proc. POPL 1981, pp. 133–138. ACM Press, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muller, D.E., Schupp, P.E.: Simulating alternating tree automata by nondeterministic automata: new results and new proofs of the theorems of Rabin, McNaughton and Safra. Theor. Comput. Sci. 141(1-2), 69–107 (1995)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pnueli, A., Rosner, R.: On the synthesis of a reactive module. In: Proc. POPL, pp. 179–190. ACM Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pnueli, A., Rosner, R.: On the synthesis of an asynchronous reactive module. In: Automata, Languages and Programming, pp. 652–671. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stockmeyer, L.J., Chandra, A.K.: Provably difficult combinatorial games. SIAM J. Comput. 8(2), 151–174 (1979)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolper, P.: Synthesis of Communicating Processes from Temporal-Logic Specifications. PhD thesis, Stanford University (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Schewe
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität des SaarlandesSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations