On Generating Content and Structural Annotated Websites Using Conceptual Modeling

  • Sven Casteleyn
  • Peter Plessers
  • Olga De Troyer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4215)


An important milestone in the evolution of the Web is the Semantic Web: a Web in which the semantics of the available content and functionality is made explicit. Web design methods, originally aimed at offering a well-structured, systematic approach to Web design, now face new opportunities and challenges: Semantic Web technology can be used to make the semantics of the conceptual design models explicit; however a major challenge is to (semi-) automatically generate the semantic annotations, effectively enabling the Semantic Web. In this paper, we describe how WSDM, a well-known Web design method, was adapted to use Semantic Web technology for its conceptual modeling and how this can be exploited to generate semantically annotated websites. We consider two types of semantic annotations: content-related annotations and structural annotations. The first type allows to describe the semantics of the content of the website, the latter are annotations that explicitly describe the semantics of the different structural elements used in the website.


Domain Ontology Mapping Rule Semantic Annotation Screen Reader Structural Annotation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ciravegna, F., Dingli, A., Petrelli, D., Wilks, Y.: User-System Cooperation in Document Annotation based on Information Extraction. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, p. 122. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cai, D., Yu, S., Ji-Rong, W., Wei-Ying, M.: Block-based web search. ACM SIGIR., 456–463 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Troyer, O., Leune, C.: WSDM: A User-Centered Design Method for Web Sites. In: Proceedings of the 7th WWW Conference, pp. 85–94. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Troyer, O., Casteleyn, S.: Modeling Complex Processes for Web Applications using WSDM. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Int. IWWOST workshop (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Troyer, O., Plessers, P., Casteleyn, S.: Conceptual View Integration for Audience Driven Web Design. In: CD-ROM Proc. of the WWW2003 Conference, Budapest, Hungary (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frasincar, F., Houben, G.-J.: Hypermedia presentation adaptation on the semantic web. In: De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., Conejo, R. (eds.) AH 2002. LNCS, vol. 2347, pp. 133–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Handschuh, S., Staab, S.: Authoring and annotation of web pages in CREAM. In: The 11th Int. World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heflin, J., Hendler, J.: Searching the web with SHOE. In: Artificial Intelligence for Web Search, Papers from the AAAI Workshop, WS-2000-2001, pp. 35–40. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang, X.-M., Xue, G.-R., Song, W.-G., Zeng, H.-J., Chen, Z., Wei-Ying, M.: Exploiting PageRank at Different Block Level. In: Zhou, X., Su, S., Papazoglou, M.P., Orlowska, M.E., Jeffery, K. (eds.) WISE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3306, pp. 241–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin, Y., Xu, S., Decker, S., Wiederhold, G.: OntoWebber: A Novel Approach for Managing Data on the Web. In: Proceedings of ICDE, pp. 488–489 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lei, Y., Motta, E., Domingue, J.: Modelling Data-Intensive Web Sites with OntoWeaver. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop WISM 2004, Riga, Latvia (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kiryakov, A., Popov, B., Terziev, I., Manov, D., Ognyanoff, D.: Semantic Annotation, Indexing, and Retrieval. Elsevier’s Journal of Web Semantics 2(1) (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moura, S., Schwabe, D.: Interface Development for Hypermedia Applications in the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of LA Web 2004, Ribeirão Preto, Brasil. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plessers, P., De Troyer, O.: Annotation for the Semamtic Web during Website Development. In: Koch, N., Fraternali, P., Wirsing, M. (eds.) ICWE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3140, pp. 349–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plessers, P., Casteleyn, S., Yesilada, Y., De Troyer, O., Stevens, R., Harper, S., Goble, C.: Accessibility: A Web Engineering Approach. In: Proceedings of the 14th Int. World Wide Web Conference, Chiba, Japan, pp. 353–362 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reif, G., Gall, H., Jazayeri, M.: WEESA - Web Engineering for Semantic Web Applications. In: Proceedings of the 14th Int. World Wide Web Conference, Chiba, Japan (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., Domingue, J., Lanzoni, M., Stutt, A., Ciravegna, F.: MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-Automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup. In: Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Management (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yesilada, Y., Harper, S., Goble, G., Stevens, R.: Screen Readers Cannot See. In: Koch, N., Fraternali, P., Wirsing, M. (eds.) ICWE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3140, pp. 445–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Casteleyn
    • 1
  • Peter Plessers
    • 1
  • Olga De Troyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Vrije Universiteit BrusselElsene – BrusselBelgium

Personalised recommendations