Fast and Adaptive Low-Pass Whitening Filters for Natural Images

  • Ling-Zhi Liao
  • Si-Wei Luo
  • Mei Tian
  • Lian-Wei Zhao
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4233)


A fast and simple solution was suggested to reduce the inter-pixels correlations in natural images, of which the power spectra roughly fell off with the increasing spatial frequency f according to a power law; but the 1/f exponent, α, was different from image to image. The essential of the proposed method was to flatten the decreasing power spectrum of each image by using an adaptive low-pass and whitening filter. The act of low-pass filtering was just to reduce the effects of noise usually took place in the high frequencies. The act of whitening filtering was a special processing, which was to attenuate the low frequencies and boost the high frequencies so as to yield a roughly flat power spectrum across all spatial frequencies. The suggested method was computationally more economical than the geometric covariance matrix based PCA method. Meanwhile, the performance degradations accompanied with the computational economy improvement were fairly insignificant.


Power Spectrum Spatial Frequency Autocorrelation Function Principle Component Analysis Natural Image 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Olshausen, B.A., Field, D.J.: Sparse Coding with an Overcomplete Basis Set: A Strategy Employed by V1? Visual Research 37, 11–25 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amari, S.: Natural Gradient Works Efficiently in Learning. Neural Computation 10, 251–276 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, A., Sejnowski, T.: The Independent Components of Natural Scenes Are Edge Filters. Vision Research 37, 3327–3338 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Hateren, J.H., van der Schaaf, A.: Independent Component Filters of Natural Images Compared with Simple Cells in Primary Visual Cortex. Proc. Royal Society ser. B 265, 359–366 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hyvärinen, A., Oja, E.: Independent Component Analysis: Algorithms and Applications. Neural Networks 13, 411–430 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olshausen, B.A., Field, D.J.: Emergence of Simple-Cell Receptive Field Properties by Learning a Sparse Code for Natural Images. Nature 381, 607–609 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olshausen, B.A.: Principles of Image Representation in Visual Cortex. In: Chalupa, L.M., Werner, J.S. (eds.) The Visual Neurosciences, MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewicki, M.S., Sejnowski, T.J.: Learning Overcomplete Representations. Neural Computation 12, 337–365 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camelio, J.A., Hu, S.J., Marin, S.P.: Compliant Assembly Variation Analysis Using Component Geometric Covariance. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 126, 355–360 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jolliffe, I.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basilevsky, A.: Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods: Theory and Applications. Wiley, New York (1994)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaaf, A., Hateren, J.H.: Modelling the Power Spectrum of Natural Images: Statistics and Information. Vision Research 36, 2759–2770 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simoncelli, E.P., Olshausen, B.A.: Natrual Image Statistics and Neural Representation. NeuroSecience, Annual Review 24, 1193–1216 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dan, Y., Atick, J.J., Reid, R.C.: Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory. Neuroscience 16, 3351–3362 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Field, D.J.: Relations between the Statistics of Natural Images and the Response Properties of Cortical Cells. Optical Society of America 4, 2379–2394 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olshausen, B.A.: How Close We Are to Understand V1? Neural Computation 17, 1665–1699 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atick, J.J., Li, Z., Redlich, A.N.: Understanding Retinal Color Coding from First Principles. Neural computation 1, 559–572 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Field, D.J.: What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? Neural Computation 6, 559–601 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Massih, H., Pearl, J.: Comparison of the Cosine and Fourier Transform of Markov-1 Signals. IEEE Trans. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 428–429 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ling-Zhi Liao
    • 1
  • Si-Wei Luo
    • 1
  • Mei Tian
    • 1
  • Lian-Wei Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer and Information TechnologyBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations