Ontology Selection for the Real Semantic Web: How to Cover the Queen’s Birthday Dinner?

  • Marta Sabou
  • Vanessa Lopez
  • Enrico Motta
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4248)


Robust mechanisms for ontology selection are crucial for the evolving Semantic Web characterized by rapidly increasing numbers of online ontologies and by applications that automatically use the associated metadata. However, existing selection techniques have primarily been designed in the context of human mediated tasks and fall short of supporting automatic knowledge reuse. We address this gap by proposing a selection algorithm that takes into account 1) the needs of two applications that explore large scale, distributed markup and 2) some properties of online ontology repositories. We conclude that the ambitious context of automatic knowledge reuse imposes several challenging requirements on selection.


Semantic Relation Query Term Query Expansion Compound Label Ontology Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alani, H., Brewster, C.: Ontology Ranking based on the Analysis of Concept Structures. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Capture(K-CAP 2005), Banff, Canada. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buitelaar, P., Eigner, T., Declerck, T.: OntoSelect: A Dynamic Ontology Library with Support for Ontology Selection. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding, L., Pan, R., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Peng, Y., Kolari, P.: Finding and Ranking Knowledge on the Semantic Web. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 156–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dzbor, M., Domingue, J., Motta, E.: Magpie - towards a semantic web browser. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 690–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-Match: An Algorithm and Implementation of Semantic Matching. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopez, V., Motta, E., Uren, V.: PowerAqua: Fishing the Semantic Web. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 393–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez, V., Pasin, M., Motta, E.: AquaLog: An Ontology-portable Question Answering System for the Semantic Web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 546–562. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magnini, B., Serafini, L., Speranza, M.: Making explicit the semantics hiden in schema models. In: Proceedings of the Human Language Technology for the Semantic Web workshop at ISWC 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mika, P.: Flink: Semantic Web Technology for the Extraction and Analysis of Social Networks. Journal of Web Semantics 3(2) (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel, C., Supekar, K., Lee, Y., Park, E.K.: OntoKhoj: A Semantic Web Portal for Ontology Searching, Ranking and Classification. In: Proceeding of the Workshop On Web Information And Data Management. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sabou, M., Lopez, V., Motta, E., Uren, V.: Ontology Selection: Ontology Evaluation on the Real Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the Evaluation of Ontologies on the Web Workshop, held in conjunction with WWW 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches. Journal of Data Semantics IV, 146–171 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spaccapietra, S.: Report on modularization of ontologies. Knowledge Web Deliverable D2.1.3.1 (July 2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan, X., Li, X., Song, D.: Document Generality: Its Computation and Ranking. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Australasian Database Conference (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Sabou
    • 1
  • Vanessa Lopez
    • 1
  • Enrico Motta
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media Institute (KMi) & Centre for Research in ComputingThe Open UniversityMilton Keynes

Personalised recommendations