Advertisement

3D Data Retrieval of Archaeological Pottery

  • Martin Kampel
  • Robert Sablatnig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4270)

Abstract

Motivated by the requirements of the present archaeology, we are developing an automated system for archaeological classification and reconstruction of ceramics. This paper shows different acquisition techniques in order to get 3D data of pottery and to compute the profile sections of fragments. With the enhancements shown in this paper, archaeologists get a tool to do archaeological documentation of pottery in a computer assisted way.

Keywords

Acquisition System Profile Line Manual Orientation Profile Section Acquisition Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beraldin, J.A., Atzeni, C.C., Guidi, G., Pieraccini, M., Lazzari, S.S.: Establishing a Digital 3d Imaging Laboratory for Heritage Applications: First Trials. In: Proceedings of the Italy-Canada 2001 Workshop on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling Applications, Padova (2001) (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Besl, P.J.: Active, optical range imaging sensors. Machine Vision and Applications 1(2), 127–152 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blais, F.: A Review of 20 Years of Range Sensor Development. In: SPIE Proceedings, Electronic Imaging, vol. 5013, pp. 62–76 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Hakim, S.F., Beraldin, J.A., Picard, M.: Detailed 3D Reconstruction of Monuments using multiple Techniques. In: Boehler, W. (ed.) Proceedings of ISPRSCIPA Workshop on Scanning for Cultural Heritage Recording, Corfu, pp. 13–18 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kampel, M.: 3D Mosaicing of Fractured Surfaces. Ph.D thesis, Vienna University of Technology (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kampel, M., Mara, H., Sablatnig, R.: Investigation on traditional and modern ceramic documentation. In: Vernazza, G., Sicuranza, G. (eds.) Proc. Of ICIP 2005 Intl. Conf. on Image Processing, Genova, Italy, September 2005, vol. 2, pp. 570–573 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kampel, M., Sablatnig, R.: Color Classification of Archaeological Fragments. In: Sanfeliu, A., Villanueva, J.J., Vanrell, M., Alquezar, R., Jain, A.K., Kittler, J. (eds.) Proc. of 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, vol. 4, pp. 771–774. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kampel, M., Sablatnig, R., Tosovic, S.: Volume based reconstruction of archaeological artifacts. In: Boehler, W. (ed.) Proc. of Intl. Workshop on Scanning for Cultural Heritage Recording, pp. 76–83 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klette, R., Koschan, A., Schlüns, K.: Computer Vision - Räumliche Information aus digitalen Bildern. Vieweg (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orton, C., Tyers, P., Vince, A.: Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993); Nescio, N.: Instructions for the Preparation of a Camera-Ready. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1991) (manuscript)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilboa, A., Karasik, A., Sharon, I., Smilansky, U.: Towards computerized typology and classification of ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 31, 681–694 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kampel, M., Mara, H., Sablatnig, R.: Investigation on Traditional and Modern Ceramic Documentation. In: Vernazza, G., Sicuranza, G. (eds.) ICIP 2005: Intl. Conf. on Image Processing, Genova, Italy, September 2005, pp. 570–573 (2005) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mara, H., Sablatnig, R.: 3D-Vision Applied in Archaeology, Forum Archaeologiae 34/III/2005 (2005), http://farch.net

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Kampel
    • 1
  • Robert Sablatnig
    • 1
  1. 1.Image Processing and Pattern Recognition GroupVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations