Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods for Protein Interaction Verification System

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4243))

Abstract

A comparative study for assessing the reliability of protein-protein interactions in a high-throughput dataset is presented. We use various state-of-the-art classification algorithms to distinguish true interacting protein pairs from noisy data using the empirical knowledge about interacting proteins. Then we compare the performance of classifiers with various criteria. Experimental results show that classification algorithms provide very powerful tools in distinguishing true interacting protein pairs from noisy protein-protein interaction dataset. Furthermore, in the data setting with lots of missing values like protein-protein interaction dataset, K-Nearest Neighborhood and Decision Tree algorithms show best performance among other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vazquez, A., Flammini, A., Maritan, A., Vespignani, A.: Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 697–700 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steffen, M., Petti, A., Aach, J., D’haeseleer, P., Church, G.: Automated modelling of signal transduction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 3, 34–44 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T.A., et al.: A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623–627 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., et al.: A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. PNAS 98, 4569–4574 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavin, A.C., Bosche, M., Krause, R., et al.: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141–147 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., et al.: Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180–183 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. von Mering, C., Krause, R., Snel, B., Cornell, M., et al.: Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399–403 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sprinzak, E., Sattath, S., Margalit, H.J.: How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? Mol. Biol. 327, 919–923 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, M.S., Park, S.S., Kim, M.K.: A Protein verification system based on a neural network algorithm. IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics, 151–154 (August 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mattews, L.R., Vaglio, P., Reboul, J., Ge, H., et al.: Identification of Potential Interaction Networks Using Sequence-Based Searches for Conserved Protein-Protein Interactions or Interologs. Genome. Res. 11, 2120–2126 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ge, H., Liu, Z., Church, G.M., Vidal, M.: Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 29, 482–486 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kemmeren, P., van Berkum, N., Vilo, J., Bijma, T., et al.: Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data. Mol. Cell 9, 1133–1143 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gygi, S., Rochon, Y., Franza, B.R., Aebersold, R.: Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. MCB 19, 1720–1730 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jasen, R., Greenbaum, D., Gerstein, M.: Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interaction. Genome Res. 12, 37–46 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhardwaj, N., Lu, H.: Correlation between gene expression profiles and protein-protein interactions within and across genomes. Bioinformatics 21, 2730–2738 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mewes, H.W., Frishman, D., Guldener, U., Mannhaupt, G., et al.: MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 31–34 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sato, T., Yamanishi, Y., Kanehisa, M., Toh, H.: The inference of protein-protein interactions by co-evolutionary analysis is improved by excluding the information about the phylogenetic relationships. Bioinformatics 21, 3482–3489 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruepp, A., Zollner, A., Maier, D., Albermann, K., et al.: The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 5539–5545 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huh, W.K., Falvo, J.V., Gerke, L.C., et al.: Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686–691 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeong, H., Mason, S.P., Barabasi, A.L., Oltvai, Z.N.: Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41–42 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ravasz, E., Somera, A.L., Mongru, D.A., Oltvai, A.N., Barabasi, A.L.: Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297, 1551–1555 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saito, R., Suzuki, H., Hayashizaki, Y.: Construction of reliable protein-protein interaction networks with a new interaction generality measure. Bioinformatics 19, 756–763 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Quinlan, R.: C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Platt, J.: Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Schoelkopf, B., Burges, C., Smola, A. (eds.) Advances in kernel methods - support vector learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. John, G.H., Langley, P.: Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers. In: Proc. of the 11th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 338–345. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aha, D., Kibler, D.: Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 6, 37–66 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Witten, I.J., Frank, E.: Data mining: practical machine learning tools with java implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, M.S., Park, S.S. (2006). Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods for Protein Interaction Verification System. In: Yakhno, T., Neuhold, E.J. (eds) Advances in Information Systems. ADVIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4243. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11890393_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11890393_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46291-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46292-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics