Advertisement

Parametric Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Yeultak Sung
  • Hojung Cha
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4239)

Abstract

Developing an ideal routing protocol that satisfies various wireless sensor network applications is difficult due to their different requirements. In this paper, we propose a parametric routing protocol that considers performance parameters such as time, reliability, and energy to satisfy various circumstances of wireless sensor network applications. Based on a geographic algorithm, the proposed protocol calculates each node’s routing costs for three performance parameters and negotiates to select the next node. The framework supports adaptive service as well as scalability because the mechanism requires only neighboring nodes’ information. The experiment shows that the proposed protocol provides adaptive services for various sensor networks applications.

Keywords

Sensor Network Wireless Sensor Network Network Lifetime Candidate Node Neighbor Table 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ledeczi, A., Volgyesi, P., Maroti, M., Simon, G., Balogh, G., Nadas, A., Kusy, B., Dora, S., Pap, G.: Multiple Simultaneous Acoustic Source Localization in Urban Terrain. In: IPSN 2005, CD-Rom, Los Angeles, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Priyantha, N.B., Chakraborty, A., Balakrishnan, H.: The Cricket location-support system. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, Boston, Massachusetts, United States (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu, N., Rangwala, S., Chintalapudi, K.K., Ganesan, D., Broad, A., Govindan, R., Estrin, D.: A wireless sensor network for structural monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (SenSys) (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levis, P., Madden, S., Gay, D., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Brewer, E., Culler, D.: The Emergence of Networking Abstractions and Techniques in TinyOS. In: Proceedings of the First USENIX/ACM Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI) (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han, C.-C., Rengaswamy, R.K., Shea, R., Kohler, E., Srivastava, M.: SOS: A dynamic operating system for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (Mobisys) (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    He, T., et al.: SPEED: A stateless protocol for real-time communication in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Providence, RI (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, C., Blum, B.M., Abdelzaher, T.F., Stankovic, J.A., He, T.: RAP: A Real-Time Communication Architecture for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS 2002), San Jose, CA (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deb, B., Bhatnagar, S., Nath, B.: ReInForM: Reliable Information Forwarding Using Multiple Paths in Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp. 406–415 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woo, A., Tong, T., Culler, D.: Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, Los Angeles, California, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang, J.-H., Tassiulas, L.: Maximum Lifetime Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Networking 12(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-Efficient Communication Protocols for Wireless Microsensor Networks. In: Proceedings of Hawaaian Int’l. Conf. on Systems Science (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Felemban, E., Lee, C.-G., Ekici, E., Boder, R., Vural, S.: Probabilistic QoS Guarantee in Reliability and Timeliness Domains in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2005, Miami, FL, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akkaya, K., Younis, M.: An Energy-Aware QoS Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Networks (MWN 2003), Providence, RI (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karp, B., Kung, H.: GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In: Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 243–254 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IEEE std. 802.15.4 - 2003: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications for Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, H., Cha, H.: Towards a Resilient Operating System for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the 2006 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Boston, NY, USA (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yeultak Sung
    • 1
  • Hojung Cha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations