Resource Allocation Systems: Some Complexity Results on the S4PR Class

  • Juan-Pablo López-Grao
  • José-Manuel Colom
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4229)


In recent times, Petri nets have consolidated as a powerful formalism for the analysis and treatment of deadlocks in Resource Allocation Systems (RAS). In particular, the methodological framework yielded by the S4PR class has raised considerable interest on the grounds of a well-balanced compromise between modelling flexibility and the provision of sound and effective correction techniques. These are strengthened by the advantages of the abstraction process, which allows the effective application of these techniques to diverse application domains. Most of the works on this class focus on providing tools and algorithms for dealing with the so-called resource allocation problem. This paper takes a different approach to provide an insight into the inherent computational complexity of the problem, from the perspective of optimality in either prevention, avoidance or detection of deadlocks. In particular, we will prove that most of the problems involved fall within the category of NP or co-NP-complete problems.


Video Stream Flexible Manufacture System Conjunctive Normal Form Truth Assignment Deadlock Prevention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Coffman, E.G., Elphick, M., Shoshani, A.: System deadlocks. ACM Computing Surveys 3(2), 67–78 (1971)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gold, E.M.: Deadlock prediction: Easy and difficult cases. SIAM Journal on Computing 7(3), 320–336 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murata, T.: Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lautenbach, K., Thiagarajan, P.S.: Analysis of a resource allocation problem using Petri nets. In: Syre, J.C. (ed.) Proc. of 1st European Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Processing, Toulouse, Cepadues Editions, pp. 260–266 (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ezpeleta, J., Colom, J., Martínez, J.: A Petri net based deadlock prevention policy for flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 11(2), 173–184 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xie, X., Jeng, M.D.: ERCN-merged nets and their analysis using siphons. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 29(4), 692–703 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, J., Reveliotis, S.A.: Deadlock avoidance in sequential resource allocation systems with multiple resource acquisitions and flexible routings. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 46(10), 1572–1583 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tricas, F.: Deadlock analysis, prevention and avoidance in sequential resource allocation systems. PhD thesis, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawley, M., Reveliotis, S.: Deadlock avoidance for sequential Resource Allocation Systems: Hard and easy cases. Int. Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 13, 385–404 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sulistyono, W., Lawley, M.: Deadlock avoidance for manufacturing systems with partially ordered process plans. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 17(6), 819–832 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brade, R., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., Jamin, S.: RFC 2205: Resource ReSerVation Protocol – Version 1 Functional Specification (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Villapol, M.E., Billington, J.: Analysing properties of the resource reservation protocol. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Best, E. (eds.) ICATPN 2003. LNCS, vol. 2679, pp. 377–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tricas, F., García-Vallés, F., Colom, J., Ezpeleta, J.: A Petri net structure-based deadlock prevention solution for sequential resource allocation systems. In: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 272–278 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garey, M., Johnson, D.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York (1979)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teruel, E., Silva, M.: Liveness and home states in equal conflict systems. In: Ajmone Marsan, M. (ed.) ICATPN 1993. LNCS, vol. 691, pp. 415–432. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    López-Grao, J.P., Colom, J.M.: Lender processes competing for shared resources: Beyond the S4PR paradigm. In: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Taipei, Taiwan (to appear, 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan-Pablo López-Grao
    • 1
  • José-Manuel Colom
    • 2
  1. 1.Dpt. of Computer Science and Systems Engineering (DIIS)Spain
  2. 2.Aragonese Engineering Research Institute (I3A)University of ZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations