Optimal Clustering-Based ART1 Classification in Bioinformatics: G-Protein Coupled Receptors Classification
Protein sequence data have been revealed in current genome research and have been noticed in demand of classifier for new protein classification. This paper proposes the optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier for the GPCR data classification and processes the GPCR data classification. We focuses on a demand of optimal classifier system for protein sequence data classification. The optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier reduces processing cost for classification effectively. We compare classification success rate to those of Backpropagation Neural Network and SVM. In experimental result of the optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier, classification success rate of ClassA group is 99.7% and that of the others group is 96.6%. This result demonstrates that the optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier is useful to the GPCR data classification. The classification processing time of the optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier is the 27% less than that of the Backpropagation Neural Network and is the 39% less than that of the SVM in an optimal clustering rate which is 15%. And the classification processing time of the optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier is the 39% less than that of the optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier in a prediction success rate which is 96%. This result demonstrates that the optimal clustering-based ART1 classifier provides the high performance classification and the low processing cost in the GPCR data classification.
KeywordsOptimal Cluster Classification Success Cluster Rate ART1 Classifier ART1 Classification
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Watson, S., Arkinstall, S.: The G-protein Linked Receptor Facts Book. Academic Press, Burlington (1994)Google Scholar
- 5.Lin, J.S., Ligomenides, P.A., Freedman, M.T., et al.: Application of artificial neural networks for reduction of false-positive detections in digital chest radiographs. In: Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care, pp. 434–438 (1993)Google Scholar
- 9.Jefferson, M.F., Narayanan, M.N., Lucas, S.B.: A neural network computer method to model the INR response of individual patients anticoagulated with warfarin. Br. J. Haematol. 89(1), 29 (1995)Google Scholar
- 12.Jaakkola, Haussler, D.: Exploiting generative models in discriminative classifiers. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 11, Morgan Kauffmann, San mateo (1998)Google Scholar
- 13.Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J.: An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
- 15.Zeigler, B.P., et al.: DEVS Framework for Modeling, Simulation, Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems in Hybrid II. LNCS, pp. 529–551. Springer, Berlin (1996)Google Scholar
- 18.Jaakkola, T., Diekhans, M., Haussler, D.: A discriminative framework for detecting remote protein homologies. J. Comput. Biol. 7 (2000)Google Scholar