GPS/INS Navigation Filter Designs Using Neural Network with Optimization Techniques

  • Dah-Jing Jwo
  • Jyh-Jeng Chen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4221)


The Global Positioning System (GPS) and inertial navigation systems (INS) have complementary operational characteristics and the synergy of both systems has been widely explored. Most of the present navigation sensor integration techniques are based on Kalman filtering estimation procedures. For obtaining optimal (minimum mean square error) estimate, the designers are required to have exact knowledge on both dynamic process and measurement models. In this paper, a mechanism called PSO-RBFN, which combines Radial Basis Function (RBF) Network andParticle Swarm Optimization (PSO), for predicting the errors and to filtering the high frequency noise is proposed. As a model nonlinearity identification mechanism, the PSO-RBFN will implement the on-line identification of nonlinear dynamics errors such that the modeling error can be compensated. The PSO-RBFN is applied to the loosely-coupled GPS/INS navigation filter design and has demonstrated substantial performance improvement in comparison with the standard Kalman filtering method.


Global Position System Particle Swarm Optimization Radial Basis Function Kalman Filter Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Farrell, J.: The Global Positioning System and Inertial Navigation. McGraw-Hill professional, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salychev, O.: Inertial Systems in Navigation and Geophysics. Bauman MSTU Press, Moscow (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vanicek, P., Omerbasic, M.: Does a navigation algorithm have to use Kalman filter? Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal 45(3) (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hosteller, L., Andreas, R.: Nonlinear Kalman filtering techniques for terrain-aided navigation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 28(3), 315–323 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Noureldin, A., Irvine-Halliday, D., Mintchev, M.P.: Accuracy limitations of FOG-based continuous measurement-while-drilling surveying inslruments for horizontal wells. IEEE Transactions on Instlumentation and Measurement 51(6), 1177–1191 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lobo, J., Lucas, P., Dias, J., de Almeida, A.T.: Inertial navigation system for mobile land vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on industrial electronics, NE 1995, vol. 2, pp. 843–848 (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mynbaev, D.K.: Errors of an inertial navigation unit caused by ring laser gyros errors. In: IEEE Position Location and Navigation Symposium, pp. 833–838 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kong, X., Nebot, E.M., Durrant-Whyte, H.: Development of a non-linear psi-angle modelfor large misalingment errors and its application in INS alignment and calibration. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, pp. 1430–1435 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle Swam Optimization. In: Proc. IEEE Neural Network Conf., Perth, Australia, pp. 1942–1945 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haykin, S.: Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan, New York (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dah-Jing Jwo
    • 1
  • Jyh-Jeng Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communications and Communications EngineeringNational Taiwan Ocean UniversityKeelungChina

Personalised recommendations