Abstract
Modelers tend to exploit the various degrees of freedom provided by the UML. The lack of uniformity and the large amount of defects contained in UML models result in miscommunication between different readers. To prevent these problems we propose modeling conventions, analogue to coding conventions for programming. This work reports on a controlled experiment to explore the effect of modeling conventions on defect density and modeling effort. 106 masters’ students participated over a six-weeks period. Our results indicate that decreased defect density is attainable at the cost of increased effort when using modeling conventions, and moreover, that this trade-off is increased if tool-support is provided. Additionally we report observations on the subjects’ adherence to and attitude towards modeling conventions. Our observations indicate that efficient integration of convention support in the modeling process, e.g. through training and seamless tool integration, forms a promising direction towards preventing defects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
SPSS, version 12.0, http://www.spss.com
Gentleware AG. Poseidon for UML, community edition, version 3.1, http://www.gentleware.com
Ambler, S.W.: The Elements of UML 2.0 Style. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: The goal question metric paradigm. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. 528–532 (1994)
Briand, L.C., Bunse, C., Daly, J.W.: A controlled experiment for evaluating quality guidelines on the maintainability of object-oriented designs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27(6), 513–530 (2001)
Coad, P., Yourdon, E.: Object Oriented Design, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)
Conradi, R., Mohagheghi, P., Arif, T., Hedge, L.C., Bunde, G.A., Pedersen, A.: Object-oriented reading techniques for inspection of UML models – an industrial experiment. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming ECOOP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2749, pp. 483–501. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Egyed, A.: Instant consistency checking for the UML. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2006), May 2006, pp. 381–390. ACM, New York (2006)
Eichelberger, H.: Aesthetics of class diagrams. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT 2002), pp. 23–31. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2002)
Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics, A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edn. Thomson Computer Press (1996)
Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software quality: The elusive target. IEEE Software 13(1), 12–21 (1996)
Kuzniarz, L., Staron, M., Wohlin, C.: An empirical study on using stereotypes to improve understanding of UML models. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC 2004), pp. 14–23. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (2004)
Lange, C.F.J.: Material of the modeling conventions experiment, http://www.win.tue.nl/~clange
Lange, C.F.J., DuBois, B., Chaudron, M.R.V., Demeyer, S.: Experimentally investigating the effectiveness and effort of modeling conventions for the UML. CS-Report 06-14, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2006)
Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Effects of defects in UML models - an experimental investigation. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2006), May 2006, pp. 401–411. ACM, New York (2006)
Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V., Muskens, J.: In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Software 23(2), 40–46 (2006)
Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)
Meerling: Methoden en technieken van psychologisch onderzoek, 4th edn., vol. 2, Boom, Meppel, The Netherlands (1989)
Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language, Adopted Final Specification, Version 2.0, ptc/03-09-15 edition (December 2003)
Omam, P.W., Cook, C.R.: A taxonomy for programming style. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Computer Science Conference, pp. 244–250 (1990)
Purchase, H.C., Allder, J.-A., Carrington, D.: Graph layout aesthetics in UML diagrams: User preferences. Journal of Graph Algoritms and Applications 6(3), 255–279 (2002)
Slaughter, S.A., Harter, D.E., Krishnan, M.S.: Evaluating the cost of software quality. Communications of the ACM 41(8), 67–73 (1998)
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlesson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslen, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering - An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
Wüst, J.: The software design metrics tool for the UML, version 1.3, http://www.sdmetrics.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lange, C.F.J., DuBois, B., Chaudron, M.R.V., Demeyer, S. (2006). An Experimental Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4199. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11880240_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11880240_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45772-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45773-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)