Advertisement

How Do Children Develop Syntactic Representations from What They Hear?

  • Elena Lieven
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4211)

Abstract

Children learn language from what they hear. In dispute is what mechanisms they bring to this task. Clearly some of these mechanisms have evolved to support the human speech capacity but this leaves a wide field of possibilities open. The question I will address in my paper is whether we need to postulate an innate \(\underline{syntactic}\)module that has evolved to make the learning of language structure possible. I will suggest that more general human social and cognitive capacities may be all that is needed to support the learning of syntactic structure.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jusczyk, P.: The discovery of spoken language. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., Moll, H.: Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 675–735 (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tomasello, M., Stahl, D.: Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: how much is enough? Journal of Child Language 31, 101–121 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., Tomasello, M.: Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 30, 333–370 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dabrowska, E., Lieven, E.: Towards a lexically specific grammar of childrens question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16, 437–474 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., Tomasello, M.: A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27, 843–873 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stoll, S., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E.: Lexically restricted utterances in russian, german and english child directed speech (submitted)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., Theakston, A.: What part of no do children not understand? a usage-based account of multiword negation (submitted)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Theakston, A., Lieven, E., Pine, J., Rowland, C.: The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: Be and have. Cognitive Linguistics 16, 247–277 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McClure, K., Pine, J., Lieven, E.: Investigating the abstractness of children’s early knowledge of argument structure. Journal of Child Language (in press, 2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abbot-Smith, K., Behrens, H.: How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: the german passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science 30 (in press, 2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aguado-Orea, J.: The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish: implications for current theories of development. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rowland, C.: Explaining errors in children’s questions. Cognition (in press, 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bates, E., Benigni, B., Camaioni, V.: The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. Academic Press, New York (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Lieven
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzig
  2. 2.School of Psychological SciencesUniversity of Manchester 

Personalised recommendations