Advertisement

Question Answering for Dutch Using Dependency Relations

  • Gosse Bouma
  • Jori Mur
  • Gertjan van Noord
  • Lonneke van der Plas
  • Jörg Tiedemann
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4022)

Abstract

Joost is a question answering system for Dutch which makes extensive use of dependency relations. It answers questions either by table look-up, or by searching for answers in paragraphs returned by IR. Syntactic similarity is used to identify and rank potential answers. Tables were constructed by mining the CLEF corpus, which has been syntactically analyzed in full.

Keywords

Information Retrieval Class Label Relative Clause Dependency Relation Question Answering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Malouf, R., van Noord, G.: Wide coverage parsing with stochastic attribute value grammars. In: IJCNLP 2004 Workshop Beyond Shallow Analyses - Formalisms and statistical modeling for deep analyses, Hainan (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Katz, B., Lin, J.: Selectively using relations to improve precision in question answering. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Natural Language Processing for Question Answering (EACL 2003), Budapest, EACL, pp. 43–50 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Litkowski, K.C.: Use of metadata for question answering and novelty tasks. In: Voorhees, E.M., Buckland, L.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the eleventh Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 2003), Gaithersburg, MD, pp. 161–170 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mollá, D., Gardiner, M.: Answerfinder - question answering by combining lexical, syntactic and semantic information. In: Australasian Language Technology Workshop (ALTW) 2004, Sydney (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., Yih, W.: Mapping dependency trees: An application to question answering. In: The 8th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics (AI&Math 04), Fort Lauderdale, FL (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouma, G., Mur, J., van Noord, G.: Reasoning over dependency relations for QA. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning for Answering Questions (KRAQ), Edinburgh, pp. 15–21 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleischman, M., Hovy, E., Echihabi, A.: Offline strategies for online question answering: Answering questions before they are asked. In: Proc. 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 1–7 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jijkoun, V., Mur, J., de Rijke, M.: Information extraction for question answering: Improving recall through syntactic patterns. In: Coling 2004, Geneva, pp. 1284–1290 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pasca, M.: Acquisition of categorized named entities for web search. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pp. 137–145 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pantel, P., Ravichandran, D.: Automatically labeling semantic classes. In: Susan Dumais, D.M., Roukos, S. (eds.) HLT-NAACL 2004: Main Proceedings, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 321–328 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    van der Plas, L., Bouma, G.: Automatic acquisition of lexico-semantic knowledge for question answering. In: Proceedings of Ontolex 2005 – Ontologies and Lexical Resources, Jeju Island, South Korea (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vossen, P.: Eurowordnet a multilingual database with lexical semantic networks (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zobel, J., Williams, H., Scholer, F., Yiannis, J., Hein, S.: The Zettair Search Engine. Search Engine Group, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin, D., Pantel, P.: Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Language Engineering 7, 343–360 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tiedemann, J.: Integrating linguistic knowledge in passage retrieval for question answering. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2005, Vancouver, pp. 939–946 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gosse Bouma
    • 1
  • Jori Mur
    • 1
  • Gertjan van Noord
    • 1
  • Lonneke van der Plas
    • 1
  • Jörg Tiedemann
    • 1
  1. 1.Information ScienceRijksuniversiteit GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations