Advertisement

SINAI at CLEF 2005: Multi-8 Two-Years-on and Multi-8 Merging-Only Tasks

  • Fernando Martínez-Santiago
  • Miguel A. García-Cumbreras
  • L. A. Ureña-López
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4022)

Abstract

This year, we participated in multilingual two years on and Multi-8 merging-only CLEF tasks. Our main interest has been to test several standard CLIR techniques and investigate how they affect the final performance of the multilingual system. Specifically, we have evaluated the information retrieval (IR) model used to obtain each monolingual result, the merging algorithm, the translation approach and the application of query expansion techniques. The obtained results show that by means of improving merging algorithms and translation resources we reach better results than improving other CLIR modules such as IR engines or the expansion of queries.

Keywords

Machine Translation Relevance Feedback Query Term Information Retrieval System Original Query 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Harman, D.K.: Relevance Feedback Revisited. In: Belkin, N.J., Ingwersen, P., Pejtersen, A.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 1992), pp. 1–10. ACM Press, New York (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    LLopis, F.: University of Alicante at CLEF 2002. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J. (eds.) CLEF 2002. LNCS, vol. 2785, pp. 103–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martínez-Santiago, F., García-Cumbreras, M., Ureña, L.A.: SINAI at CLEF 2004: Using Machine Translation Resources with a Mixed 2-Step RSV Merging Algorithm. In: Peters, C., Clough, P., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B. (eds.) CLEF 2004. LNCS, vol. 3491, pp. 156–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martínez-Santiago, F., Martín, M., Ureña, L.A.: SINAI at CLEF 2002: Experiments with Merging Strategies. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J., Kluck, M. (eds.) CLEF 2002. LNCS, vol. 2785, pp. 103–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martínez-Santiago, F., Ureña, L.A., Martín, M.: A Merging Strategy Proposal: Two Step Retrieval Status Value Method. Information Retrieval 9(1), 95–109 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robertson, S.E., Walker, S.: Okapi-Keenbow at TREC-8. In: Proceedings of the 8th Text Retrieval Conference TREC-8, NIST Special Publication 500-246, pp. 151–162 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Martínez-Santiago
    • 1
  • Miguel A. García-Cumbreras
    • 1
  • L. A. Ureña-López
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto. Computer ScienceUniversity of JaénSpain

Personalised recommendations