Advertisement

Motivational Effects Within Scientific Experimentation Scenarios

  • Astrid Wichmann
  • Markus Kuhn
  • Kay Hoeksema
  • Ulrich Hoppe
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4227)

Abstract

This paper reports on scientific experimentation activities conducted in the EU project COLDEX. Learning scenarios have been developed that allow students to carry out scientific experiments in various fields of science such as astronomy, probability etc. The activities were supported by a collaborative experimentation environment called “CoolModes”. The environment will be described in detail regarding its support for experiments from different areas of science. The focus of this study was evaluating the learning scenarios. Students’ motivation was assessed right after participating in the scenarios. Attitudes regarding computers and science in general were investigated to gain additional background variables.

Keywords

Motivational Effect Cool Mode Visual Language Learning Scenario Algebraic Formula 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, M.: Examining the Performance and Attitudes of Sixth Graders During Their Use of A Problem-Based Hypermedia Learning Environment. Computers in Human Behavior 20(3), 357–379 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kivinen, K.: Assessing Motivation and the Use of Learning (2003) [online] [March 15, 2005], Academic dissertation, available at: http://acta.uta.fi/pdf/951-44-5556-8.pdf
  3. 3.
    Chinn, C.A., Malhotra, B.A.: Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education 86, 175–218 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jonassen, D.H.: Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. Prentice-Hall, Columbus (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jonassen, D.H.: Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change. Merrill/Prentice-Hall, Columbus (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoppe, H.U.: Collaborative mind tools. In: Tokoro, M., Steels, L. (eds.) The Future of Learning. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Project COLDEX (Collaborative Learning and Distributed Experimentation), Download from: http://www.coldex.info
  8. 8.
    Baloian, N., Breuer, H., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, U., Milrad, M.: Implementing the Challenge Based Learning in Classroom Scenarios. In: Sotiriou, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Symposium on Advanced Technologies in Education, Argostoli, Greece (July 2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinkwart, N., Malzahn, N., Westheide, D., Hoppe, H.U.: Community Support Based on Thematic Objects and Similarity Search. In: Aroyo, L., Dicheva, D. (eds.) Workshop proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia, Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, pp. 57–60 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pinkwart, N.: A Plug-In Architecture for Graph Based Collaborative Modeling Systems. In: Hoppe, U., Verdejo, F., Kay, J. (eds.) Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 535–536. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abelson, H., di Sessa, A.: Turtle Geometry: The Computer as a Medium for Exploring Mathematics. M.I.T Press, Cambridge (1981)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoeksema, K., Jansen, M., Hoppe, H.U.: Interactive Processing of Astronomical Observations in a Cooperative Modelling Environment. In: Kinshuk, Looi, C.-K., Sutinen, E., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th EEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 888–889 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhn, M., Hoppe, H.U., Lingnau, A., Wichmann,: Computational Modelling and Simulation Fostering New Approaches in Learning Probability. Innovations in Education and Training International Journal (IETI) (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fischbein, E.: The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Reidel, London (1975)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Miyashita, K., Ropp, M.: Instruments for assessing educator progress in technology integration. Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning (IITTL), Denton, TX (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van de Vijver, F., Hambleton, R.K.: Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist 1(2), 89–99 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Plenum, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klopfer, L.E.: Evaluation of learning in science. In: Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T., Madaus, G.F. (eds.) Handbook of summative and formative evaluation of student learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lott, K.: Evaluation of a Statewide Science Inservice and Outreach Program: Teacher and Student Outcomes. Journal of Science Education and Technology 12(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wood, M.S.: Science-related attitudes and effort in the use of educational software by high school students. Senior thesis, Center for Educational Technologies, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV (unpublished, 1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fraser, B.J.: Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education 62, 509–515 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knezek, G., Miyashita, K.: A preliminary study of the Computer Attitude Questionnaire. In: Knezek, G. (ed.) Studies on children and computers: The 1993-94 23. Fulbright Series, pp. 1993–1994. Texas Center for Educational Technology, Denton (1994)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wichmann, A., Kuhn, M., Hoppe, U.: Communication through the Artifact by Means of Synchronous Co-construction. In: ICLS Proceedings 2006, Bloomington, Indiana (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Astrid Wichmann
    • 1
  • Markus Kuhn
    • 1
  • Kay Hoeksema
    • 1
  • Ulrich Hoppe
    • 1
  1. 1.Collide Group, Institute for computer science and interactive systemsUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations