Intelligent Agents That Make Informed Decisions

  • John Debenham
  • Elaine Lawrence
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4203)


Electronic markets with access to the Internet and the World Wide Web, are information-rich and require agents that can assimilate and use real-time information flows wisely. A new breed of “information-based” agents aims to meet this requirement. They are founded on concepts from information theory, and are designed to operate with information flows of varying and questionable integrity. These agents are part of a larger project that aims to make informed automated trading in applications such as eProcurement a reality.


Multiagent System Relative Entropy Intelligent Agent World Model Electronic Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wooldridge, M.: Multiagent Systems. Wiley, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lawrence, E., Newton, S., Corbitt, B., Lawrence, J., Dann, S., Thanasankit, T.: Internet Commerce — Digital Models for Business, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, D., Simoff, S.: Informing the Curious Negotiator: Automatic news extraction from the Internet. In: Williams, G., Simoff, S. (eds.) Data Mining: Theory, Methodology, Techniques, and Applications, pp. 176–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: An information-based model for trust. In: Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Koenig, S., Kraus, S., Singh, M., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS-2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 497–504. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacKay, D.: Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaynes, E.: Probability Theory — The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, Y., Bandar, Z.A., McLean, D.: An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15, 871–882 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 199–215 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142, 205–237 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Debenham
    • 1
  • Elaine Lawrence
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations