Advertisement

Agent Based Simulation Architecture for Evaluating Operational Policies in Transshipping Containers

  • Lawrence Henesey
  • Paul Davidsson
  • Jan A. Persson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4196)

Abstract

An agent based simulator for evaluating operational policies in the transshipment of containers in a container terminal is described. The simulation tool, called SimPort, is a decentralized approach to simulating managers and entities in a container terminal. We use real data from a container terminal, for evaluating eight transshipment policies. The simulation results indicate that good choices of yard stacking and berthing position polices can lead to faster ship turn-around times, for instance, the Overall Time Shortening policy offers a lower cost and when combined with a Shortest Job First sequencing of arriving ships on average yielded a faster ship turn around time. The results also indicated, with respect to the studied performance measures that Stacking by Destination is a good choice of policy.

Keywords

Operational Policy Container Terminal Quay Crane Ship Line Transshipment Operation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Davidson, N.: A global capacity assessment and needs analysis. In: Proceedings of the 39th Terminal Operating Conference, Antwerp, Belgium (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frankel, E.G.: Port Planning and Development. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Monie, G.: Inter-port cooperation and competition: developing trans-shipment operations in the Mediterranean Environmental Scanning in Ports. In: Proceedings of the Fourth MedTrade 2006. St. Julians, Malta (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vis, I.F.A., de Koster, R.: Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research 147, 1–16 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meersmans, P.J.M., Dekker, R.: Operations Research supports container handling. Technical Report, The Netherlands Econometric Institute Report EI 2001-22, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, November 2 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steenken, D.D., Vos, S., Stahlback, R.: Container terminal operations and operations research - a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26, 3–49 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henesey, L.: Enhancing Container Terminals: A Multi-Agent Systems Approach. Licentiate Thesis. Department of Systems and Software Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden, pp. 1–132 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, C.-I., Hossein, J., Ioannou, P.A.: Design, Simulation, and Evaluation of Auto-mated Container Terminals. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent transportation systems 3, 12–26 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchheit, M., Kuhn, N., Müller, J.P., Pischel, M.: MARS: Modeling a multiagent scenario for shipping companies. In: Proceedings of the European Simulation Symposium (ESS1992), Dresden, Germany (1992) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Degano, C., Pellegrino, A.: Multi-Agent Coordination and Collaboration for Control and Optimization Strategies in an Intermodal Container Terminal. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC 2002), Cambridge, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gambardella, L.M., Rizzoli, A.E., Zaffalon, M.: Simulation and planning of an inter-modal container terminal. Simulation 71, 107–116 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rebollo, M., Vicente, J., Carrascosa, C., Botti, V.: A Multi-Agent System for the Automation of a Port Container Terminal. In: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents 2000 workshop on Agents in Industry, Barcelona, Spain (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rebollo, M., Vicente, J., Carrascosa, C., Botti, V.: A MAS Approach for Port Container Terminal Management. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Iberoamerican workshop on DAIMAS, Atiaia, Sao Paulo, Brazil (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, T.-W., Park, N.-K., Lee, D.-W.: Design of Simulation System for Port Resources Availability in Logistics Supply Chain. In: Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME 2002), Panama City, Panama (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carrascosa, C., Rebollo, M., Vicente, J., Botti, V.: A MAS Approach for Port Container Terminal Management: The Transtainer Agent. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Analysis and Synthesis, Orlando, US (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thurston, T., Hu, H.: Distributed Agent Architecture for Port Automation. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2002). Oxford, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ocean Shipping Consultants: European and Mediterranean Containerport Markets to 2015. Ocean Shipping Consultants, Ltd., Surrey, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baird, A.: Optimising the container transhipment hub location in northern Europe. Journal of Transport Geography (in press, 2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson, I.D., Roach, P.A.: Container stowage planning: a methodology for generating computerised solutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2000, 1248–1255 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henesey, L.: Agent Based Simulation for Evaluating the Operational Policies in the Tran-shipping of Containers. Transportation Review (submitted for publication, 2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multi Agent Systems. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wernstedt, F.: An Overview. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden (manuscript, 2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parunak, H.V.D., Savit, R., Riolo, R.L.: Agent-Based Modeling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users’ Guide. In: Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Gilbert, N. (eds.) MABS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1534, pp. 10–25. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Henesey, L., Notteboom, T., Davidsson, P.: Agent-based simulation of stakeholders relations: An approach to sustainable port and terminal management. In: Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME 2003), Busan, Korea (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    TTS AB Port Equipment AB. Gothenburg, Sweden (Internet site: visited last July 03, 2006), http://www.tts-hs.no/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Henesey
    • 1
  • Paul Davidsson
    • 1
  • Jan A. Persson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systems and Software EngineeringBlekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlshamnSweden

Personalised recommendations